Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM61120
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as the most significant driver of change in the cybersecurity landscape for 2026, with 94% of industry leaders identifying it as a primary catalyst for transformation. While AI enhances defensive capabilities through automated incident response and proactive threat modeling, it simultaneously introduces accelerated risks, including AI-powered disinformation and adversarial machine learning. This research paper investigates this dual-use paradigm, analyzing how defenders are transitioning from reactive to proactive security postures. The study is grounded in a survey of 200 cybersecurity professionals, revealing a sharp rise in AI security assessments, increasing from 37% in 2025 to 64% in 2026. The findings also highlight a growing reliance on AI-driven analytics for real-time decision-making in security operations centers (SOCs). The paper explores the convergence of AI with Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) as a foundational framework for resilient digital ecosystems, particularly in cloud and edge environments. It underscores the urgency for governance models capable of keeping pace with rapid AI innovation. As threat actors evolve, the balance between automation and human oversight emerges as a critical factor in cybersecurity effectiveness.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/24/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...