Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56148
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study investigates the treatment of dairy-industry wastewater using a simple, single-stage ultrafiltration (UF) system equipped with polyether sulfone (PES) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes under laboratory-scale conditions. The influent exhibited high organic loading (COD ≈ 3,950 mg L⁻¹, BOD₅ ≈ 1,750 mg L⁻¹), characteristic of small dairy effluents. System performance was evaluated in terms of permeate flux, contaminant removal, and fouling behavior. Optimum operation was achieved at a transmembrane pressure of 2 bar, yielding average COD and TSS removal efficiencies of 78 % and 97 % for PES, and 73 % and 95 % for PVDF, respectively. Flux decline was primarily reversible, governed by cake-layer formation, and effectively mitigated through a two-step NaOH–citric acid cleaning protocol restoring over 90 % of the initial flux. The system operated with low specific energy demand (0.35 kWh m⁻³) and treatment cost (≈ 0.28 USD m⁻³), highlighting its potential for decentralized and small-scale dairy applications. The results confirm that simplified UF setups can deliver reliable effluent quality, operational stability, and economic feasibility for sustainable wastewater management in the dairy sector.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...