Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57256
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Often, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) programs undergo failures because the controls are not tested and either inconsistently executed on cloud platforms or blind to modern data movement patterns like API-driven integrations, SaaS collaboration, encrypted channels, and unmanaged devices. Therefore, this whitepaper describes a practical, cross-cloud approach to test the DLP effectiveness of multi-cloud ecosystems. The cloud ecosystems include Google Cloud, AWS, Azure/Microsoft 365, and common SaaS platforms. It provides information about the dominant DLP enforcement models, such as endpoint-based controls, inline (proxy/SSE), API-based (out-of-band scanning and remediation), and cross-cloud capabilities. It also maps each model to real-world leakage paths and general failure modes. Later, this paper provides a structured testing methodology with test datasets, validating controls in transit, at rest, and in use states, enforcing evasion scenarios like encryption, alternative channels, compression, image/OCR gaps, data splitting, blind spots and verifies the operational readiness like SIEM/SOC integration, alert fidelity, and incident response workflows. In the end, for continuous validation, it suggests some practical recommendations like policy tuning and closing gaps using layered controls and conditional access. It also enables CISOs and security engineers to improve and measure DLP outcomes in multi-cloud environments so that there is no need to rely on platform-specific assumptions. The objective is to help security teams evaluate and strengthen DLP posture while understanding the gaps between native cloud DLP and third-party solutions.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
18
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...