Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67594
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-25
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

INSTITUTE OF LEGAL STUDIES,
- SHRI RAM SWAROOP MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW – DEVA ROAD, BARABANKI, 225003
The rapid expansion of India’s digital economy has intensified the collection, processing, storage, and exchange of personal data, creating significant challenges for privacy, accountability, and responsible data governance. Against this backdrop, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act) and the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 (DPDP Rules) represent a significant transition from fragmented data-related regulation towards a dedicated statutory framework for digital personal data protection. Within this emerging framework, the principle of Data Protection by Design assumes particular significance as a preventive approach that seeks to integrate privacy and data-protection safeguards into organisational processes, technological systems, and data-processing practices from their inception rather than addressing risks after harm occurs. The constitutional foundation of such an approach can be traced to the recognition of privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 and the broader doctrine of informational autonomy developed by the Supreme Court of India in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017). This paper critically examines the emerging obligations relevant to Data Protection by Design under the DPDP framework and evaluates the extent to which the existing regulatory architecture facilitates preventive data governance. It analyses the responsibilities of Data Fiduciaries, including the adoption of reasonable security safeguards, organisational accountability, risk management, and measures aimed at preventing personal data breaches. The paper further identifies regulatory challenges arising from the absence of an explicitly articulated and comprehensive statutory model of “privacy by design,” particularly concerning standardisation of compliance practices, technological accountability, regulatory oversight, and implementation by small and medium-sized entities. A comparative perspective with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is also employed to identify potential lessons for strengthening India’s preventive data-protection architecture (European Parliament & Council of the European Union, 2016). The paper argues that effective Data Protection by Design requires clearer regulatory expectations, proportionate compliance mechanisms, technological safeguards, and stronger accountability standards. It concludes by proposing measures to develop a more preventive, risk-sensitive, and rights-oriented data protection regime in India.
KEYWORDS
Data Protection by Design represents an important transition from reactive privacy protection towards preventive data governance. In an increasingly data-dependent economy, individuals cannot reasonably be expected to protect themselves against every consequence of complex and invisible data-processing operations. Responsibility must therefore also rest upon organisations that determine how personal information is collected, processed, stored, shared, and deleted. India's DPDP Act, 2023 and Rules, 2025 establish an important foundation for this approach through obligations relating to Data Fiduciaries, security safeguards, accountability, consent, children's data, and other aspects of responsible data processing. Nevertheless, the framework does not yet articulate Data Protection by Design with the same explicitness and conceptual coherence found in Article 25 of the GDPR. The future development of India's data protection regime should therefore focus on converting broad statutory principles into practical, risk-sensitive, and technologically adaptable design standards. Such an approach would enable privacy to become an integral feature of digital systems rather than a corrective measure applied after harm has occurred. Ultimately, the effectiveness of India's data protection framework will depend not only upon the existence of statutory rights and regulatory institutions but upon whether privacy is embedded within the architecture of India's digital ecosystem itself.
1. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2018). Guidelines on automated individual decision-making and profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679. European Commission. 2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2018). Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679. European Commission. 3. Bennett, C. J., & Raab, C. D. (2006). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. MIT Press. 4. Bygrave, L. A. (2014). Data privacy law: An international perspective. Oxford University Press. 5. Cavoukian, A. (2011). Privacy by design: The 7 foundational principles. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. 6. Committee of Experts under the Chairmanship of Justice B. N. Srikrishna. (2018). A free and fair digital economy: Protecting privacy, empowering Indians. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. 7. De Hert, P., Papakonstantinou, V., Malgieri, G., Beslay, L., & Sanchez, I. (2018). The right to data protection in the era of the General Data Protection Regulation. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 179–194. 8. De Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2016). The new General Data Protection Regulation: Still a sound system for the protection of individuals? Computer Law & Security Review, 32(2), 179–194. 9. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, No. 22, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India). 10. Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India.
Publication Date
10/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...