Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56999
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Debate and public speaking evaluation traditionally depend on human judgment, which can be subjective, inconsistent, and time-intensive. With advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), automated systems can now provide structured and objective language analysis. This paper presents DebateGPT, a real-time AI-based debate argument analyzer that integrates speech recognition, transformer-based NLP models, sentiment analysis, and grammatical evaluation into a unified mobile-compatible framework. The proposed system captures spoken input, converts it into text using advanced Speech-to-Text (STT) models, and analyzes argument structure, logical coherence, and emotional tone. The backend is developed using FastAPI and Python, while the frontend is implemented using Kotlin Compose for Android. Transformer models from Hugging Face are utilized for argument mining and sentiment classification, and speech recognition is powered by models such as OpenAI Whisper. The system generates structured feedback reports in real time, enabling debaters to identify strengths and weaknesses immediately. The proposed architecture aims to reduce subjectivity in debate evaluation while enhancing learning efficiency and communication skill development. Key terms Natural Language Processing, Transformer Models, Speech Recognition, Argument Mining, Sentiment Analysis, Real-Time Evaluation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...