Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM34521
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Recent advancements in natural language production provide an additional tool to manipulate public opinion on social media. Furthermore, advancements in language modelling have significantly strengthened the generative capabilities of deep neural models, empowering them with enhanced skills for content generation. Consequently, text-generative models have become increasingly powerful allowing adversaries to use these remarkable abilities to boost social bots, allowing them to generate realistic deepfake posts and influence the discourse among the public. To address this problem, the development of reliable and accurate deepfake social media message detecting methods is important. Under this consideration, current research addresses the identification of machine-generated text on social networks like Twitter. In this study, a straightforward deep learning model in combination with word embeddings was employed for the classification of tweets as human-generated or bot-generated using a publicly available Tweep fake dataset. A conventional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture is devised, leveraging Fast text word embeddings, to undertake the task of identifying deepfake tweets. To showcase the superior performance of the proposed method, we employed several machine learning models as baseline methods for comparison. These baseline methods utilized various features, including term frequency, term frequency-inverse document frequency, Fast Text, and Fast Text sub word embeddings.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45433
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...