Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM38293
Volume:
8 |
10 |
Oct 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Who is Defending Against an Enemy That Uses Kamikaze Drones? — Now or in the future, kamikaze drones will cause a significant challenge for defense systems due to their speed, agility, and cost. Being mostly low and slow are exactly the characteristics that render these drones so difficult to defend against, for traditional defense mechanisms developed to engage higher, faster-moving targets have a hard time detecting and intercepting them in time. The low cost of kamikaze drones has made them a favoured weapon amongst adversaries, as virtuosos aspire to destabilize far-out sized military forces. That is the reliable source of the haunting requirement for original counter-measures that can furnish solutions. But for as commonly as these drones are being deployed, there is a serious dearth when it comes to technologies that can effectively thwart their attacks. To take on attacks like swarms of drones being launched at the same time, a next-generation air defense solution would need to counter high volumes of simultaneous and coordinated threats. This research examines the importance of increasing the chances of defeating targets with a direct contribution of sophisticated radar, directed energy devices, electronic warfare, as well as kinetic means. Some of the systems that we have come across and evaluated as a potential for destroying kamikaze drones include Epirus Leonidas (HPM) System, Giraffe 1X Radar, Oerlikon Skyshield, Phalanx CIWS, etc. Evaluating existing technologies and systems, this document seeks to offer a viable plan on how suicidal drone attacks can be countered thus bridging the current void in air defense mechanisms.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/29/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...