Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM63583

Democracy, Globalization, and Global Justice: Reimagining Inclusive Global Governance

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM63583

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1--

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM63583

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

MM

Ms. Meena

Political Science

Starex University, Gurugram, India

Download Author Certificate
DAD

Dr. Anju Devi

Political Science

Starex University, Gurugram, India

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This research delves into the intricate relationship among global justice, democratic principles, and globalization. Grounded in contemporary democratic theories, the study explores how democracy and public reasoning contribute to the pursuit of global justice. The research also investigates the impact of globalization on these dynamics, emphasizing the interconnectedness of transnational issues and the need for collaborative solutions. In this qualitative research approach of thematic analysis has employed to identify and analyse recurring themes and patterns within. Themes include issues of justice, democratic practices, and the impact of globalization on decision-making processes in global governance. The study identifies persistent challenges, including inequalities in global governance structures and the delicate balance required between national interests and global collaboration. Despite the aspirational principles of justice and democracy, these challenges highlight the ongoing considerations necessary for the evolution of global governance. By addressing challenges and emphasizing the collaborative nature of decision-making, the study contributes to the ongoing discourse on creating a more just, inclusive, and effective global governance framework.

KEYWORDS

Key Words: Global Justice Democratic Principles Globalization Global Governance Capacity Approach.

Cite This Article

Ms. Meena, Dr. Anju Devi, "Democracy, Globalization, and Global Justice: Reimagining Inclusive Global Governance," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1--, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM63583

Full Article/Conclusion

The interplay between democracy, globalization, and global justice reveals a dynamic and intricate relationship that shapes the contemporary landscape of international relations and ethical considerations. Modernist approaches to democracy, rooted in principles of inclusivity, political equality, and safeguarding individual rights, provide a foundational framework for understanding political power dispersion and decision-making processes. This perspective resonates with the principles of globalization, where power dynamics extend beyond national borders, emphasizing interconnectedness and the need for equal participation in global affairs. In the context of global justice, democracy and globalization underscores the ethical imperative of addressing issues such as poverty, inequality, human rights violations, and environmental degradation on a global scale. The commitment to eradicating severe poverty and challenging increasing global inequalities aligns with the principles of political equality and universal suffrage inherent in modernist democratic ideals. The limitations on majority power, within the framework of modernist democracy, find resonance in global justice considerations, emphasizing the importance of safeguards against powerful nations infringing upon the rights of less powerful ones. This speaks to the need for a just global order that prevents the marginalization of certain nations or populations in the face of global decision-making processes. Moreover, the emphasis on political freedoms, rule of law, and constitutional frameworks within modernist democracy aligns with global justice principles, advocating for the protection of individual liberties and the consideration of inalienable human rights on a global scale. This human-centric focus acknowledges the interconnectedness of diverse issues and emphasizes the importance of prioritizing the well-being of individuals within the global community. The dimension of democracy contributing to beneficial government reinforces the idea that democratic governance, when guided by principles of justice, can contribute to positive global outcomes. This aligns with global justice objectives, emphasizing poverty alleviation, addressing inequalities, and protecting human rights internationally. As the world navigates the complexities of a globalized environment, the interplay between democracy, globalization, and global justice establishes a convincing narrative. It calls for a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the interconnectedness between political ideologies, international relations, and ethical considerations. By embracing the principles of modernist democracy and acknowledging the challenges and opportunities presented by globalization, the global community can work towards fostering a just and equitable future that prioritizes the well-being of individuals and nations alike.    

References

The interplay between democracy, globalization, and global justice reveals a dynamic and intricate relationship that shapes the contemporary landscape of international relations and ethical considerations. Modernist approaches to democracy, rooted in principles of inclusivity, political equality, and safeguarding individual rights, provide a foundational framework for understanding political power dispersion and decision-making processes. This perspective resonates with the principles of globalization, where power dynamics extend beyond national borders, emphasizing interconnectedness and the need for equal participation in global affairs. In the context of global justice, democracy and globalization underscores the ethical imperative of addressing issues such as poverty, inequality, human rights violations, and environmental degradation on a global scale. The commitment to eradicating severe poverty and challenging increasing global inequalities aligns with the principles of political equality and universal suffrage inherent in modernist democratic ideals. The limitations on majority power, within the framework of modernist democracy, find resonance in global justice considerations, emphasizing the importance of safeguards against powerful nations infringing upon the rights of less powerful ones. This speaks to the need for a just global order that prevents the marginalization of certain nations or populations in the face of global decision-making processes. Moreover, the emphasis on political freedoms, rule of law, and constitutional frameworks within modernist democracy aligns with global justice principles, advocating for the protection of individual liberties and the consideration of inalienable human rights on a global scale. This human-centric focus acknowledges the interconnectedness of diverse issues and emphasizes the importance of prioritizing the well-being of individuals within the global community. The dimension of democracy contributing to beneficial government reinforces the idea that democratic governance, when guided by principles of justice, can contribute to positive global outcomes. This aligns with global justice objectives, emphasizing poverty alleviation, addressing inequalities, and protecting human rights internationally. As the world navigates the complexities of a globalized environment, the interplay between democracy, globalization, and global justice establishes a convincing narrative. It calls for a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the interconnectedness between political ideologies, international relations, and ethical considerations. By embracing the principles of modernist democracy and acknowledging the challenges and opportunities presented by globalization, the global community can work towards fostering a just and equitable future that prioritizes the well-being of individuals and nations alike.    

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/20/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...