Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53530
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
India’s literacy journey has seen substantial improvements—from roughly 12 % in 1947 to 80.9 % among individuals aged seven and above in 2023–24—but stark disparities persist across states, genders, and urban–rural divides. Data from PLFS 2023–24 show national male literacy at 87.2 % and female literacy at 74.6 %, resulting in a persistent gender gap of 12.6 percentage points. The analysis underscores urban literacy of 88.9 % versus rural literacy of 77.5 %, highlighting an 11–14 point rural–urban divide in key states such as Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan. State-level findings reveal substantial heterogeneity: northeastern and smaller states like Mizoram (98.2 %), Lakshadweep (97.3 %), Kerala (95.3 %), Tripura (93.7 %), and Goa (93.6 %) lead literacy rankings, while populous states such as Bihar (74.3 %), Madhya Pradesh (75.2 %), and Rajasthan (75.8 %) continue to lag. Gender gaps exceed 20 points in laggard regions, while high-performing states record gaps of under 3–4 points. This study systematically analyzes long-term trends in literacy from 1951 to 2023–24—disaggregating by state, gender, and region and explores the role of major initiatives like ULLAS (New India Literacy Programme). Programmatic efforts such as ULLAS have been instrumental in achieving full literacy status in Mizoram, Tripura, and Goa, through a volunteer-driven, life-skills–based approach.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/10/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...