Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62895

Design and Analysis of Modular Steel Mould Systems for SUPERDUCT Precast Arch Drainage Structures

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62895

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1--

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62895

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Om Doble

Om Doble

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Author Certificate
aishwarya kedar

aishwarya kedar

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
shrikant mallik

shrikant mallik

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
anish hurpate

anish hurpate

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
Sanwal Tidke

Sanwal Tidke

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
Ritesh Mudliar

Ritesh Mudliar

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Prof Mohan Pidurkar

Prof Mohan Pidurkar

civil engineering

priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the design, analysis, and comparative evaluation of modular steel mould (shuttering) systems for SUPERDUCT precast arch concrete drainage structures. Three mould sizes — T3, T5, and T9 — were studied with respect to geometric parameters, component weight distribution (internal panel, external panel, and collar), and capability ratios computed against concrete volume, water opening area, and total shuttering surface area. Data was collected from field observations at Buttibori Fabrication Yard, Hingna site, and VNIT Nagpur, supplemented by 3D AutoCAD modelling and AI-assisted design trials. Results show mould capability improves systematically with size: T9 provides 3.80× the hydraulic opening at only 1.95× the mould weight of T3. Total mould weight per m² of surface area remains stable at 141–145 kg/m² across all sizes, confirming consistent panel design. The collar is identified as the fastest-growing component. Design benchmarks are proposed for future mould development.

KEYWORDS

Keywords— SUPERDUCT Modular Steel Mould Precast Concrete Shuttering Design Mould Size T3 T5 T9 Arch Drainage Structure.

Cite This Article

Om Doble, aishwarya kedar, shrikant mallik, anish hurpate, Sanwal Tidke, Ritesh Mudliar, Prof Mohan Pidurkar, "Design and Analysis of Modular Steel Mould Systems for SUPERDUCT Precast Arch Drainage Structures," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1--, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62895

Full Article/Conclusion

Based on field data, 3D modelling, and systematic capability analysis of T3, T5, and T9, the following conclusions are established: 1.  Capability improves with size — T9 delivers 3.80× the hydraulic opening at only 1.95× the mould weight of T3. Total mould weight per m³ of concrete improves 24.5%. 2.  Hydraulic capability is the strongest indicator — mould weight per m² of water opening drops 48.6% from T3 to T9 (937 → 482 kg/m²). This should be the primary criterion for mould size selection. 3.  Panel design is consistently calibrated — total mould weight per m² of surface varies only ±4% (139.9–145.4 kg/m²). No over-engineering of larger panels observed. 4.  Collar is the priority optimization target — growing 2.23× vs 1.95× for total weight. For sizes beyond T9, collar joint design must be revisited. 5.  T5 internal panel correction to 1,051 kg restores consistent progression in all capability ratios across the three sizes. 6.  Design benchmarks for future moulds — (a) Total wt/m³ concrete < 1,187 kg/m³; (b) Total wt/m² water opening < 482 kg/m²; (c) Total wt/m² surface = 141–146 kg/m²; (d) Collar fraction < 20%. 7.  Trend extrapolation (Fig. 10) projects a hypothetical T-next mould at ≈ 5,900–6,200 kg total weight with water opening per m² surface continuing to improve, guiding future design targets. 8.  AI tools show promise — Claude AI generated 2D profiles and stiffener layouts but could not complete autonomous 3D assembly. Structured AI workflows with engineering validation represent a viable future direction.

References

[1]  Indian Roads Congress, IRC:SP:13-2004, Guidelines for the Design of Small Bridges and Culverts, New Delhi, India, 2004. [2]  Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456:2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice, New Delhi, India, 2000. [3]  Precast Concrete Institute, PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete, 8th ed., Chicago, IL, USA: PCI, 2017. [4]  Anthropic, "Claude AI," Conversational AI System, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.anthropic.com [5]  Buttibori Fabrication Yard, Nagpur, Maharashtra — Mould Component Documentation and Weight Records, 2025. (Field Data) [6]  VNIT Nagpur, Structural Test Models for SUPERDUCT Proof Loading, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Nagpur, India, 2025. [7]  National Highways Authority of India, NHAI Standard Specifications for Cross-Drainage Works, New Delhi, India. [8]  Central Road Research Institute, CRRI Technical Report on Precast Concrete Drainage Structures for Highway Projects, New Delhi, India.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/8/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...