Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62895
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1--
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering

civil engineering
priyadarshini bhagwati college of engineering
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the design, analysis, and comparative evaluation of modular steel mould (shuttering) systems for SUPERDUCT precast arch concrete drainage structures. Three mould sizes — T3, T5, and T9 — were studied with respect to geometric parameters, component weight distribution (internal panel, external panel, and collar), and capability ratios computed against concrete volume, water opening area, and total shuttering surface area. Data was collected from field observations at Buttibori Fabrication Yard, Hingna site, and VNIT Nagpur, supplemented by 3D AutoCAD modelling and AI-assisted design trials. Results show mould capability improves systematically with size: T9 provides 3.80× the hydraulic opening at only 1.95× the mould weight of T3. Total mould weight per m² of surface area remains stable at 141–145 kg/m² across all sizes, confirming consistent panel design. The collar is identified as the fastest-growing component. Design benchmarks are proposed for future mould development.
KEYWORDS
Based on field data, 3D modelling, and systematic capability analysis of T3, T5, and T9, the following conclusions are established: 1. Capability improves with size — T9 delivers 3.80× the hydraulic opening at only 1.95× the mould weight of T3. Total mould weight per m³ of concrete improves 24.5%. 2. Hydraulic capability is the strongest indicator — mould weight per m² of water opening drops 48.6% from T3 to T9 (937 → 482 kg/m²). This should be the primary criterion for mould size selection. 3. Panel design is consistently calibrated — total mould weight per m² of surface varies only ±4% (139.9–145.4 kg/m²). No over-engineering of larger panels observed. 4. Collar is the priority optimization target — growing 2.23× vs 1.95× for total weight. For sizes beyond T9, collar joint design must be revisited. 5. T5 internal panel correction to 1,051 kg restores consistent progression in all capability ratios across the three sizes. 6. Design benchmarks for future moulds — (a) Total wt/m³ concrete < 1,187 kg/m³; (b) Total wt/m² water opening < 482 kg/m²; (c) Total wt/m² surface = 141–146 kg/m²; (d) Collar fraction < 20%. 7. Trend extrapolation (Fig. 10) projects a hypothetical T-next mould at ≈ 5,900–6,200 kg total weight with water opening per m² surface continuing to improve, guiding future design targets. 8. AI tools show promise — Claude AI generated 2D profiles and stiffener layouts but could not complete autonomous 3D assembly. Structured AI workflows with engineering validation represent a viable future direction.
[1] Indian Roads Congress, IRC:SP:13-2004, Guidelines for the Design of Small Bridges and Culverts, New Delhi, India, 2004. [2] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456:2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice, New Delhi, India, 2000. [3] Precast Concrete Institute, PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete, 8th ed., Chicago, IL, USA: PCI, 2017. [4] Anthropic, "Claude AI," Conversational AI System, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.anthropic.com [5] Buttibori Fabrication Yard, Nagpur, Maharashtra — Mould Component Documentation and Weight Records, 2025. (Field Data) [6] VNIT Nagpur, Structural Test Models for SUPERDUCT Proof Loading, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Nagpur, India, 2025. [7] National Highways Authority of India, NHAI Standard Specifications for Cross-Drainage Works, New Delhi, India. [8] Central Road Research Institute, CRRI Technical Report on Precast Concrete Drainage Structures for Highway Projects, New Delhi, India.
Publication Date
5/8/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...