Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68649
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Electrical Engineering
Government Polytechnic Karad

Electrical Engineering
Government Polytechnic Karad

Electrical Engineering
Government Polytechnic Karad

Electrical Engineering
Government Polytechnic Karad

Electrical Engineering
Government Polytechnic Karad

Electrical Engineering
Government Polytechnic Karad
This engineering design study specifies an Internet of Things based liquid fertilizer application system that separates soil-moisture irrigation demand from authorization to deliver fertilizer. An ESP32 controller coordinates water-level and flow interlocks, calibrated stock dosing, prewetting and line flushing, while retaining local control during loss of Wi-Fi. A deterministic reference model was executed with synthetic, already qualified sensor inputs at one-second intervals. For an illustrative 24-emitter arrangement, the assumed carrier flow is 0.80 L/min. A 60 mL stock dose at 30 mL/min requires 120 s; 60 s of prewetting and 90 s of flushing give a 270 s cycle, 3.60 L of carrier water and 3.66 L of total solution. All 12 predefined scenarios matched their expected outcomes, and 1,080 single-fault timing cases produced no violations of the specified dosing and shutdown invariants. A ±10% change in dosing-pump flow changes the delivered dose to 54–66 mL, demonstrating the limitation of timed open-loop metering. These results establish internal consistency of the stated design model. They do not demonstrate prototype performance, crop response or resource savings; physical calibration and field evaluation remain necessary.
KEYWORDS
An ESP32-based IoT drip-fertigation design has been specified with separate irrigation demand, bounded stock authorization, flow and level interlocks, prewetting, timed injection and flushing. For an illustrative 24-emitter case, analytical sizing gives a 120 s stock injection and 270 s complete cycle, with 3.60 L of carrier water and 60 mL of stock. Twelve predefined computational scenarios matched their expected results, and 1,080 single-fault timing traces produced no violations of the stated model assertions. The sensitivity calculation shows that ±10% pump-flow variation changes the timed dose to 54–66 mL, while the mixed-volume flushing model retains a nonzero residual after three volume exchanges. These findings make calibration and outlet verification necessary parts of the proposed implementation. The study establishes a reproducible basis for prototype development; it does not demonstrate experimental dosing accuracy, water or fertilizer savings, crop yield improvement, or field reliability.
[1] R. G. Allen, L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith, Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome, Italy: FAO, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://www.fao.org/4/X0490E/X0490E00.htm [2] A. Phocaides, Handbook on Pressurized Irrigation Techniques, 2nd ed. Rome, Italy: FAO, 2007, ch. 16, pp. 16.1–16.5. [Online]. Available: https://www.fao.org/4/a1336e/a1336e16.pdf [3] J. Gutiérrez, J. F. Villa-Medina, A. Nieto-Garibay, and M. A. Porta-Gándara, “Automated irrigation system using a wireless sensor network and GPRS module,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 166–176, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2013.2276487. [4] Vinod Kumar S, C. D. Singh, K. V. Ramana Rao, M. Kumar, and Y. A. Rajwade, “Development of a smart IoT-based drip irrigation system for precision farming,” Irrigation and Drainage, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 21–37, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ird.2757. [5] F. Idris, A. Abdul Latiff, M. A. Buntat, Y. Lecthmanan, and Z. Berahim, “IoT-based fertigation system for agriculture,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1574–1581, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.11591/eei.v13i3.6829. [6] E. A. A. D. Nagahage, I. S. P. Nagahage, and T. Fujino, “Calibration and validation of a low-cost capacitive moisture sensor to integrate the automated soil moisture monitoring system,” Agriculture, vol. 9, no. 7, Art. no. 141, 2019, doi: 10.3390/agriculture9070141. [7] S. Adla, N. K. Rai, S. H. Karumanchi, S. Tripathi, M. Disse, and S. Pande, “Laboratory calibration and performance evaluation of low-cost capacitive and very low-cost resistive soil moisture sensors,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 2, Art. no. 363, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20020363. [8] Y. E. Kunt, “Development of a smart autonomous irrigation system using Iot and AI,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11835, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.11835. [9] Espressif Systems, “ESP32 series datasheet.” Accessed: Oct. 31, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://documentation.espressif.com/esp32_datasheet_en .html [10] Espressif Systems, “Analog to digital converter (ADC) oneshot mode driver,” ESP-IDF Programming Guide, ESP32. Accessed: Oct. 31, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/api-reference/peripherals/adc/adc_oneshot.html
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...