Design and Development of RentEase: A Smart Web-Based Property Rental Management System

The proposed RentEase platform provides a centralized web-based solution for simplifying property rental activities and improving communication between tenants and property owners. The system incorporates separate modules for tenants, owners and administrators, enabling organized user management, property listing, verification and booking request handling. Its field-based grouping facility introduces an additional approach to accommodation discovery by categorizing users according to educational and professional backgrounds. The interface results presented in the project demonstrate the home page, registration, login, property browsing and community-based property discovery facilities. Digital rent agreement generation further aims to reduce conventional paperwork and simplify rental documentation. The administrator-controlled verification mechanism provides a structured approach to reviewing users and property listings. Overall, RentEase establishes a foundation for a more accessible, organized and technology-driven rental service. Further testing, payment integration, enhanced security and intelligent recommendation facilities can improve its functionality and practical application.

[1] N. Naeem, I. A. Rana, and A. R. Nasir, “Digital real estate: A review of the technologies and tools transforming the industry and society,” Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities, vol. 1, Art. no. 15, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s44268-023-00016-0. [2] T. Wainwright, “Rental proptech platforms: Changing landlord and tenant power relations in the UK private rental sector?” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 339–358, 2023, doi: 10.1177/0308518X221126522. [3] G. Boeing, J. Harten, and R. Sanchez-Moyano, “Digitalization of the housing search: Homeseekers, gatekeepers, and market legibility,” Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University, Mar. 2023. [4] D. Rogers, S. Maalsen, P. Wolifson, and D. Fields, “Proptech and the private rental sector: New forms of extraction at the intersection of rental properties and platform rentierisation,” Urban Studies, vol. 61, no. 14, pp. 2778–2794, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00420980241262916. [5] Z. Nasreen, N. Gurran, and P. Shrestha, “Supplementary rental supply? The digital market for low-cost and informal housing in Sydney, Australia,” Urban Studies, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 3086–3109, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00420980241262227. [6] J. Migozzi, “The good, the bad and the tenant: Rental platforms renewing racial capitalism in the post-apartheid housing market,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 534–558, 2024, doi: 10.1177/02637758231195962. [7] M. Ferreri and R. Sanyal, “Digital informalisation: Rental housing, platforms, and the management of risk,” Housing Studies, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1035–1053, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2021.2009779. [8] A. Pumputis, “Complexities of trust building through sociomaterial arrangements of peer-to-peer platforms,” Current Issues in Tourism, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1800–1813, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2214848. [9] A. Amrollahi, T.-F. Kummer, M. Rajaeian, and A. (H.) Hadinejad, “Trust dynamics in sharing economy services during a crisis: A comparison between Airbnb and Uber,” International Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 26, no. 4, Art. no. e2676, 2024, doi: 10.1002/jtr.2676. [10] L. Przhedetsky, “Mediating access: Unpacking the role of algorithms in digital tenancy application technologies,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1826–1842, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2334904.