Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68433

Design and Kinematic Analysis of a High-Speed Mechanical Hammering Machine Using a Cycloidal Cam Mechanism

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68433

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68433

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Deep Kalsariya

Deep Kalsariya

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Author Certificate
Siddharth Parmar

Siddharth Parmar

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Co-Author Certificate
Karan Rakholiya

Karan Rakholiya

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Co-Author Certificate
Yogesh Dholariya

Yogesh Dholariya

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Yogesh Dholariya

Yogesh Dholariya

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Dr. Subhash University

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Many mechanical hammering machines are driven by crank or eccentric mechanisms, which give the hammer a near-sinusoidal stroke that spends as long going down as coming up. This paper examines a cam-driven alternative in which a single-lobe disc cam with a roller follower gives the hammer a cycloidal downstroke over only 99° of cam rota-tion and a 180° return. A 1 HP, 1440 rpm motor and a three-stage V-belt reduction (14.06:1) set the camshaft at 102.4 rpm, so each blow takes 0.586 s and the descent lasts 161 ms. For a 97.8 mm follower stroke and a 99.7 mm hammer stroke, cycloidal kinematics give a peak hammer velocity of 1.24 m/s, a peak acceleration of 24.1 m/s² and 1.53 J of kinetic energy for a 2 kg hammer. At the same stroke and shaft speed this is 3.3 times the energy of a symmetric cycloidal profile and 5.4 times that of simple harmonic motion, but the peak lever load rises from 34 N to 68 N and the pressure angle reaches about 34°. All results are analytical; no impact measurements are reported.

KEYWORDS

Cam-follower mechanism cycloidal motion mechanical hammer belt-pulley reduction impact energy kinematic analysis.

Cite This Article

Deep Kalsariya, Siddharth Parmar, Karan Rakholiya, Yogesh Dholariya, Yogesh Dholariya, "Design and Kinematic Analysis of a High-Speed Mechanical Hammering Machine Using a Cycloidal Cam Mechanism," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-7, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68433

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper worked a cam-driven mechanical hammer through from motor to hammer by calculation. A 1 HP, 1440 rpm motor and a three-stage V-belt reduction of 14.06:1 give a camshaft speed of 102.4 rpm, one blow every 0.586 s. A cycloidal cam that assigns 99° to the downstroke, 15° to a dwell, 180° to the return and 66° to a second dwell produces a peak hammer velocity of 1.24 m/s and 1.53 J of kinetic energy for a 2 kg hammer, with a peak acceleration of 24.1 m/s2 and a peak lever load of 67.9 N. Compared with a symmetric cycloidal motion at the same stroke and speed, the energy is 3.3 times greater for a lever load 2.0 times greater and compared with simple harmonic motion it is 5.4 times greater. Reaching the same energy by adding mass would need a 6.6 kg hammer and a 113 N peak load. Materials and fabrication for the prototype cost INR 13,040. The results come with limits that should be stated plainly. Nothing has been measured, so the energy, velocity and loads are ideal values from a rigid-body calculation. The 1.53 J is the kinetic energy at mid-stroke and is delivered in full only if the work surface is placed there or the hammer can separate from the lever. The cam-driven peak velocity is below that of a free drop through the same stroke, so the advantage is over symmetric drives at the same speed. The pressure angle of about 34° exceeds the usual 30° limit; with the present 110 mm base circle, meeting it would need a descent angle of about 115° and would cost roughly a quarter of the energy. The spring preload, the shaft and bearing sizes and the contact stress in the cam have not been calculated here. Several steps would turn these calculations into tested results: instrumented measurement of hammer velocity and impact force on the prototype; a dynamic simulation of the cam, follower, lever and hammer that includes the compliance of the leaf spring; finite element checks of the frame, lever and shafts; a larger base circle or another adjustment to bring the pressure angle under 30°; and a comparison of other motion laws at the same 99° allocation. An adjustable stroke, speed control and guarding for the belts and cam would also be needed before any production use.

References

[1]   A. A. M. S. Al Aamri, S. Mudassir, M. V. Kulkarni, A. Hipolito and A. A. S. AlAwaid, “Modelling and fabrication of power hammer machine,” EPRA Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., 2023. [2]  R. L. Norton, Design of Machinery: An Introduction to the Synthesis and Analysis of Mechanisms and Machines, 6th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020. [3]  M. J. Rider, Design and Analysis of Mechanisms: A Planar Approach. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2015. [4]  H. Qiu, C.-J. Lin, Z.-Y. Li, H. Ozaki, J. Wang and Y. Yue, “A universal optimal approach to cam curve design and its applications,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 669–692, 2005. [5]  T. T. N. Nguyen, S. Kurtenbach, M. Hüsing and B. Corves, “A general framework for motion design of the follower in cam mechanisms by using non-uniform rational B-spline,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 137, pp. 374–385, 2019. [6]  M. Mandal and T. K. Naskar, “Introduction of control points in splines for synthesis of optimized cam motion program,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 255–271, 2009. [7]  G. Gatti and D. Mundo, “On the direct control of follower vibrations in cam–follower mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2010. [8]  H. D. Desai and V. K. Patel, “Computer aided kinematic and dynamic analysis of cam and follower,” in Proc. World Congr. Eng. (WCE), vol. II, London, U.K., 2010, pp. 1246–1250. [9]  L.-I. Wu, W.-T. Chang and C.-H. Liu, “The design of varying-velocity translating cam mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 42, pp. 352–364, 2007. [10] A. H. de Freitas Avelar and L. F. Soares, “Nomograms for maximum pressure angles in radial cams with follower eccentricity for cycloidal and harmonic motion curves,” Acta Sci. Technol., vol. 45, e57823, 2023, doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v45i1.57823.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

10

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...