Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68422
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PRIYADARSHINI COLLAGE OF ENGINEERING,NAGPUR

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PRIYADARSHINI COLLAGE OF ENGINEERING,NAGPUR

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PRIYADARSHINI COLLAGE OF ENGINEERING,NAGPUR

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PRIYADARSHINI COLLAGE OF ENGINEERING,NAGPUR

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PRIYADARSHINI COLLAGE OF ENGINEERING,NAGPUR

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PRIYADARSHINI COLLAGE OF ENGINEERING,NAGPUR
This project centres on developing and simulating an experimental test apparatus designed to conduct a comparative analysis of next-generation refrigerants with minimal global warming potential (low-GWP). The main goal is to evaluate how alternative refrigerants perform in comparison to the standard refrigerant R134a when used in a compact vapour-compression refrigeration system. The refrigerants being studied include R1234yf and R1234ze(E) (hydrofluoroolefins), the blends R513A and R450A, and the natural refrigerant R290 (propane), with R134a serving as the reference baseline. The planned apparatus includes a bench-scale vapour-compression test rig featuring a variable-speed compressor, a water-cooled condenser, an electronic expansion valve, and an evaporator with an adjustable heat-load circuit. Auxiliary equipment such as a liquid receiver, filter-drier, sight glass, vacuum pump, and charging system enable safe transitions between different refrigerants. Temperature, pressure, mass flow rate, and compressor power measurements are collected at key cycle points, allowing for consistent comparison of the same equipment across all refrigerants under identical operating conditions. As part of this project, a thermodynamic model of the refrigeration cycle is developed using mass balance, energy balance, and exergy balance equations for each component, with refrigerant properties sourced from a standard property database. The COP is the main performance indicator analyzed in this study. Other parameters such as volumetric cooling capacity, compressor discharge temperature, pressure ratio, exergy efficiency, and total equivalent warming impact were also considered. The results of the simulations will be helpful in determining the most promising refrigerants and operating conditions. The study will also propose a set of operating scenarios that minimize the TEWI value.
KEYWORDS
A bench-scale test facility for the evaluation of alternative refrigerants allows the comprehensive comparison of low-GWP substitutes for R134a. The facility comprises a variable-displacement compressor, a water-cooled condensing unit, an electronically controlled expansion valve, and an adjustable thermal load evaporator. Identical testing procedures determine the properties of R134a, R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R513A, R450A, and R290 under identical conditions. The experimental campaign revealed that the comparison of performance characteristics of alternative refrigerants requires a standardized set of equipment, precise control and regulation of operating conditions, and systematic consideration of safety aspects, environmental concerns, and thermodynamic performance. Thermodynamic simulations allow the calculation of the cooling capacity, compressor power, coefficient of performance, pressure ratio, discharge pressure, exergy-related performance indicators, and total equivalent warming impact for each refrigerant. The operating parameters have the most significant impact on the system’s performance, including the condensing and evaporating temperatures, superheat levels at the evaporator’s outlet, and the thermophysical properties of the working fluid. A properly designed experimental facility combined with relevant computational procedures can help practitioners and researchers find the most optimal refrigerant from a proposed list before the experimental campaign or identify performance trade-offs affecting operational safety, efficiency, and climate-related concerns.
1. Mota-Babiloni, J. Navarro-Esbrí, Á. Barragán-Cervera, F. Molés, B. Peris, “Drop-in energy performance evaluation of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) in a vapour compression system as R134a replacements”, Appl. Therm. Eng. 71 (2014) 259–265 2. J. Navarro-Esbrí, J. M. Mendoza-Miranda, A. Mota-Babiloni, A. Barragán-Cervera, J. M. Belman-Flores, “Experimental analysis of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a vapor compression system”, Int. J. Refrig. 36 (2013) 870–880. 3. D. Sánchez, R. Cabello, R. Llopis, I. Arauzo, J. Catalán-Gil, E. Torrella, “Energy performance evaluation of R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R600a, R290 and R152a as low-GWP R134a alternatives”, Int. J. Refrig. 74 (2017) 267–280. 4. J. Sun, W. Li, B. Cui, “Energy and exergy analyses of R513A as a R134a drop-in replacement in a vapor compression refrigeration system”, Int. J. Refrig. 112 (2020) 348–356. 5. K. Dağıdır, K. Bilen, “Usage of R513A as an alternative to R134a in a refrigeration system: An experimental investigation based on the Kigali amendment”, Int. J. Thermofluids 21 (2024) 100582. 6. D. Sánchez, A. Andreu-Nácher, D. Calleja-Anta, R. Llopis, R. Cabello, “Energy impact evaluation of different low-GWP alternatives to replace R134a in a beverage cooler. Experimental analysis and optimization for the pure refrigerants R152a, R1234yf, R290, R1270, R600a and R744”, Energy Convers. Manag. 256 (2022) 115388. 7. M. O. McLinden, A. F. Kazakov, J. S. Brown, P. A. Domanski, “A thermodynamic analysis of refrigerants: Possibilities and tradeoffs for Low-GWP refrigerants”, Int. J. Refrig. 38 (2014) 80–92. 8. H. Bell, J. Wronski, S. Quoilin, V. Lemort, “Pure and pseudo-pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library CoolProp”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014) 2498–2508. 9. E. W. Lemmon, I. H. Bell, M. L. Huber, M. O. McLinden, “NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties – REFPROP, Version 10.0”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg (2018). 10. ANSI/ASHRAE, “Standard 34-2022: Designation and Safety Classification of Refrigerants”, ASHRAE, Atlanta (2022).
Publication Date
10/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
Funding Agency: ASHRAE
Grant / Project ID: Equipment Grant
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...