Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60759
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
A double pipe heat exchanger consists of a pair of pipes (tubes) one positioned concentrically within the other. Double pipe heat exchangers are often connected in series to provide an increased heat transfer surface. They may be connected to have a parallel flow arrangement to handle large process steam flow. The inner pipe is often finned. The double pipe heat exchanger is adopted for low flow rate, high temperature and high- pressure application. These types of heat exchangers found their applications in heat recovery processes, air conditioning and refrigeration systems, chemical reactors, and food and dairy processes. The double pipe heat exchanger would normally be used for many continuous systems having small to medium head duties. The double pipe heat exchanger is used in industry such as condenser for chemical process and cooling fluid process. A lot of research has been done on the design and analysis of a double pipe heat exchanger. From the experimental results it is concluded that at higher flow rate i.e. 8 LPM all the parameters for both the flow arrangement are same. LMTD, Overall heat transfer coefficient, Average heat transfer, Heat transfer from hot and cold water all these parameters’ values are same for 8 LPM flow rates for both parallel and counter flow arrangements. In this CFD analysis of tube in tube heat exchanger we found that hot fluid gets cool down and cold fluid gets heated up to 3ᵒC in the counter flow study and for parallel flow study the difference is 2 to 2ᵒC. As we increase the number of iterations the solution gets converge and it will give more accurate results but if we use 500 iterations the temperature difference is less for both the flow.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/20/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...