Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM35003
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The impact performance of a vehicle chassis is critical for safety and durability, influenced significantly by the materials used. Two common materials are AISI 4130 and AISI 1018, each with distinct properties affecting their impact resistance. AISI 4130, a chromium-molybdenum steel, is known for its high strength and toughness, providing excellent resistance to deformation and cracking. This makes it ideal for high-performance vehicles where impact resistance is crucial. However, its increased weight can be a drawback in some applications. Conversely, AISI 1018 is a low-carbon steel offering a balance of strength, ductility, and formability. It is lighter and more easily formed into complex shapes, making it a cost-effective choice for many applications. Despite its lower strength compared to AISI 4130, it is suitable for scenarios where weight and cost are more critical. Choosing between AISI 4130 and AISI 1018 depends on specific application needs. For high impact resistance and performance, AISI 4130 is preferred. For weight-sensitive and cost-efficient applications, AISI 1018 is more suitable. The decision requires careful consideration of material properties, application requirements, and design constraints.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45440
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...