Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68237

Design Management in Luxury Automotive Organisations: An Integrative Review of Process, Governance, and Capability

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68237

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-18

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68237

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

JRD

Janmejay R Desai

School of Design

GLS University

Download Author Certificate
DID

Dr Isha Dave

School of Design

GLS University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Design management in luxury automotive organisations sits at the intersection of several literatures that have developed largely in parallel: design management theory, new product development process research, cross-functional integration, design leadership, luxury brand management, and design value measurement. This paper integrates those literatures through a structured review of 61 sources, identified through searches of Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar covering 1990 to 2026 and through citation chasing, and screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria in Section 2.3. The synthesis organises findings across six domains and identifies three tensions that cut across them: structure against flexibility in process design, hierarchy against collaboration in decision authority, and heritage against innovation in brand stewardship. Each tension has been posed in the literature and none has been resolved in a design-intensive setting. Evidence bearing on all three comes predominantly from high-volume manufacturing and general consumer markets, leaving open whether established findings transfer to low-volume production with high brand-equity sensitivity. The review makes a diagnostic contribution. It shows where the six literatures rest on incompatible assumptions, specifies what evidence would adjudicate each tension, and sets out research gaps together with the designs that would close them.

KEYWORDS

design management luxury automotive new product development cross-functional integration design value measurement

Cite This Article

Janmejay R Desai, Dr Isha Dave, "Design Management in Luxury Automotive Organisations: An Integrative Review of Process, Governance, and Capability," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-18, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68237

Full Article/Conclusion

This review integrated scholarship across six domains that have developed with limited contact. The synthesis found a substantial body of relevant theory and a set of disagreements the literature has not settled: whether design value originates in user understanding or in interpretation away from users; whether structured development processes help or harm work of high aesthetic novelty; whether integration mechanisms established in volume manufacturing transfer to small design organisations; and where the boundary sits between design elements a brand may change and those it may not. Senior design leadership emerged as the clearest absence. Upper echelon theory predicts strong leader effects where decisions rest on judgment resistant to codification, and aesthetic judgment under brand constraint is such a decision class. No empirical study located here examines how the role combines its functions or how variation in it relates to outcomes. Closing that gap requires access to senior design practitioners and a method suited to eliciting tacit judgment, which sets the agenda for the interview study proposed in Section 5.3.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building Strong Brands. New York: Free Press. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89. Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. Argote, L. (2013). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. Balmer, J. M. T. (2013). Corporate heritage, corporate heritage marketing, and total corporate heritage communications. European Journal of Marketing, 47(9/10), 1482–1524. Beverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003–1029. Borja de Mozota, B. (2003). Design Management: Using Design to Build Brand Value and Corporate Innovation. New York: Allworth Press. Borja de Mozota, B. (2006). The four powers of design: A value model in design management. Design Management Review, 17(2), 44–53. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/24/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...