Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68406
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Electronics and Telecommunication
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Electronics and Telecommunication
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Electronics and Telecommunication
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Electronics and Telecommunication
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Electronics and Telecommunication
Defence Institute of Advance Technology
Electronics and Telecommunication
Sinhgad College of Engineering
Designing a microstrip patch antenna still means running an EM simulation, adjusting the dimensions by hand, and running it again. That works for a simple rectangular patch, but the cost grows quickly once the geometry or the specifications get more demanding. This review looks at how deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) have been used at each stage of that workflow, from design to simulation, fabrication, and optimization. It draws on four studies: a decision tree combined with a fuzzy inference system for classifying antennas and predicting their parameters; a dual-band design study using multi-output regression and a residual network; an artificial neural network (ANN) framework for optimizing 5G smart antennas; and a PRISMA-based survey of ML/DL work in antenna engineering. The paper is organized in the order a designer would work through the problem. It starts with design basics and the generation of datasets from EM simulations, then covers forward and inverse DL models, followed by parametric-optimization case studies with a comparison between them, and finally fabrication and measurement. One thing stands out across all the studies: none of them checks its DL predictions against a fabricated, measured antenna. Every result stays in simulation. We treat this as the main open problem and propose a six-stage DL-assisted design–simulation–fabrication framework aimed at closing that gap.
KEYWORDS
This review examined four studies that together cover much of the ML/DL toolbox used in microstrip antenna design: a decision-tree-plus-fuzzy-inference framework for classification and parameter estimation, a multi-output regression and ResNet study of coupled dual-band geometry, an ANN-based study of operational optimization for 5G smart antennas, and a PRISMA-based survey of the wider field. Rather than grouping them by antenna type, the review followed the order in which a design project is actually carried out: design fundamentals, simulation-based dataset generation, DL modeling, parametric optimization, and fabrication and validation. The main finding, is that none of the reviewed case studies checks its DL predictions against fabricated, measured hardware. The broader survey shows this is not a quirk of the three case studies. It is a pattern across the field. A second finding is that many reported accuracy figures are too good to take at face value. MAPE values near 0% and R² values are more consistent with small, correlated datasets and possible overfitting than with a model that has captured antenna behavior almost perfectly. We flagged these figures throughout the review and did not treat them as settled results. The proposed framework addresses both problems. It has six stages: analytical initialization, constrained dataset generation, forward and inverse DL modeling, surrogate-assisted optimization, fabrication and measurement, and an optional feedback stage. Its defining contribution is fabrication and measurement, where a single geometry is fabricated and its DL-predicted, EM-simulated, and VNA-measured performance are compared directly. Because this project covers fabrication and parametric optimization as well as design and simulation, it can make the comparison that the existing literature leaves out. The framework is intended to serve as the starting structure for the methodology chapter.
[1] R. Ramasamy and M. A. Bennet, “An Efficient Antenna Parameters Estimation Using Machine Learning Algorithms,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 130, pp. 169–181, 2023. [2] R. Gadhafi, A. Copiaco, Y. Himeur, K. Afsari, H. Mukhtar, K. Ghanem, and W. Mansoor, “Exploring the Potential of Deep-learning and Machine-learning in Dual-band Antenna Design,” IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 2024, doi: 10.1109/OJCS.2024.3463190. [3] P. Kavitha and A. Thatikonda, “Optimizing 5G Smart Antenna Design Parameters using Deep Learning,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, vol. 12, no. 22s, pp. 2073–2080, 2024. [4] N. Sarker, P. Podder, M. R. H. Mondal, S. S. Shafin, and J. Kamruzzaman, “Applications of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Antenna Design, Optimization and Selection: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 103890–103915, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3317371.
Publication Date
10/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...