Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68435

Design Thinking Approach for an AI-Based Personalized Learning System

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68435

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

K.Thennarasi

K.Thennarasi

Department of computer science and engineering

Kings College of Engineering

Download Author Certificate
K.Sevanthi

K.Sevanthi

Department of computer science and engineering

Kings College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
S.Swathi

S.Swathi

Department of computer science and engineering

Kings College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
R.Sujitha

R.Sujitha

Department of computer science and engineering

Kings College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
S.Shanmathi

S.Shanmathi

Department of computer science and engineering

Kings College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Acceptance Certificate

Abstract

Learners differ in prior knowledge, pace, interests and goals, yet most classrooms and digital courses deliver the same content to everyone. Artificial intelligence (AI) can adapt learning to the individual, but many AI-based systems are built around available data and algorithms rather than around the real needs of learners and teachers. This paper proposes the use of the design thinking process (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype and Test) as a human-centred framework for developing an AI-based personalized learning system. It describes how each stage can be applied, with example research methods, personas and “How might we” questions; presents a modular system architecture together with candidate learner-modelling and recommendation techniques; outlines an illustrative learner scenario, an implementation roadmap and an evaluation plan; and discusses ethical concerns such as privacy, bias, transparency and wellbeing. The paper is conceptual: it offers a design approach and does not report experimental results. It concludes that combining design thinking with AI helps create learning systems that are useful, trusted and adopted by their users.

KEYWORDS

design thinking artificial intelligence personalized learning adaptive learning human-centred design learner model knowledge tracing educational technology

Cite This Article

K.Thennarasi, K.Sevanthi, S.Swathi, R.Sujitha, S.Shanmathi, "Design Thinking Approach for an AI-Based Personalized Learning System," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-5, Oct 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper proposed a design thinking approach for developing an AI-based personalized learning system. By empathising with learners and teachers, defining the right problem, ideating the division of work between AI and humans, prototyping early and testing repeatedly, designers can build systems that are not only technically capable but also useful, understandable and fair. Future work should implement a prototype following this framework, compare different learner-modelling techniques, and evaluate the effect on learning outcomes, engagement and fairness with real learners.

References

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan et al. (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27–52. Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé III, H., Dudík, M., & Wallach, H. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? In Proceedings of CHI 2019. ACM. Kelley, J. F. (1984). An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(1), 26–41. Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

0

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...