Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67957
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION
BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION
While GenAI is transforming the customer interface in banking, there is limited empirical evidence that offers insights into why customers in India may or may not embrace GenAI. This study explores the effects of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), security and privacy (SP) and perceived risk (PR) on customers' intentions to use GenAI capabilities in Indian banking, examines trust in GenAI as a mediator between the two, and examines differences in intention across groups of respondents. A structured online questionnaire (five-point Likert scale) was used to gather data, which was subsequently analysed in MS Excel using descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, chi-square tests of independence, one-way ANOVA and regression-based mediation (Sobel test) and moderation (interaction terms) models. Together, the four perceived characteristics accounted for 34.2% of the variance in adoption intention (F(4, 126) = 16.35, p < .001); and, when examined individually, only perceived usefulness was found to be a statistically significant predictor (B = 0.226, p = .017). All four characteristics were robust predictors of trust in GenAI (R² = .739) but failed to mediate the influence of the four on the adoption intention (all Sobel p > .42). There were four significant moderation effects (interaction p < .05) for digital literacy. In the chi-square tests, intention was not significantly different across gender or prior use or frequency of use of the AI features, and in the ANOVA, intention was significantly different across usage frequencies (F(4, 126) = 4.68, p = .001), and was linked to age group. The study provides a preliminary evidence basis for banks and policymakers in India around the adoption of GenAI by customers.
KEYWORDS
This research explores the factors influencing customers' decision to embrace GenAI-powered banking products in India. Taken together, perceived usefulness, ease of use, security and privacy and perceived risk accounted for nearly one-third of the variance in adoption intention, with perceived usefulness being the primary individual predictor for the overall sample. These did not go through trust, and digital literacy significantly moderated all four relations. Prior use of AI-features and intention were largely independent of each other and gender. It is important to note that the data are numerous and repeated responses, and are obtained from a student sample, so should be viewed as tentative evidence, subject to further investigation with a larger, verified and more diverse sample.
1. Lee, D. K. C., Guan, C., Yu, Y., & Ding, Q. (2024). A comprehensive review of generative AI in finance. FinTech, 3(3), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech3030025 2. Thuraisamy, K. S., Baig, Z., & Zeadally, S. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in financial services: Opportunities, challenges, and cyberthreats. IT Professional, 27(2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2025.3534270 3. Moharrak, M., & Mogaji, E. (2025). Generative AI in banking: Empirical insights on integration, challenges and opportunities in a regulated industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 43(4), 871–896. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2024-0490 4. Chua, X. J., Tan, J. M. L., Tan, J. X., Poh, S. C., Goh, Y. X., Choong, D. H. T., Foong, C. M., Yang, S. J., & Chan, C. S. (2025). Banking done right: Redefining retail banking with language-centric AI. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track, 646–658. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-industry.45 5. Chen, Y., Yan, S., Jin, Y., Li, J., & Jin, X. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in finance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 4(2), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i2.1191 6. Raju, R. (2025). From models to markets: Generative AI and its emerging role in Indian financial services. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5223947 7. Fan, M. (2024). LLMs in banking: Applications, challenges and approaches. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Economy, Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence (DEBAI 2024). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3700058.3700107 8. Ek, L., & Arnarp, E. (2024). Generative AI in traditional banking institutes [Master’s thesis, Lund University]. Lund University Publications. Lund University Publications 9. Gehrmann, S., Huang, C., Teng, X., Yurovski, S., Bhorkar, A., Thomas, N., Doucette, J., Rosenberg, D., Dredze, M., & Rabinowitz, D. (2025). Understanding and mitigating risks of generative AI in financial services. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’25). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732168 10. Ostrowska, A. (2025). Large language models in the banking sector: Areas, opportunities, and threats. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 87(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2025.87.3.16
Publication Date
10/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...