Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59406
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The skill in writing a good research paper is at the center of academic achievement, the sharing of knowledge and scholarly trustworthiness. Nonetheless, numerous researchers, especially those who are new to the field or in the middle of their research or those with limited experience in writing a manuscript, often find it challenging, not due to a shortage of ideas or information, but due to the inability to structure a manuscript to form a logical and scholarly work. This paper establishes a workable academic model that would enable researchers to organize a good research paper in a systematic, logical, and publication-focused way. With references to the traditions of academic writing, the practice of manuscript evaluation, and the principles of research design, the paper suggests an integrative toolkit, which traces the paper-writing process since the formulation of the title and the formulation of the problem, through the synthesis of the literature, gap identification, objective formulation, methodological alignment, results presentation, discussion, and contribution development. The framework focuses on the consistency of the internal, the clarity of the argument, the consistency of the sections, and the correspondence between the quality of the research and the architecture of the manuscript. Moreover, the article provides a research training, doctoral supervision, faculty development, and a journal manuscript preparation toolkit and section-based flow model. The novelty of the research is in the translation of generalized academic writing requirements into a clear and simple set of rules that facilitate the creation of consistent, thorough, and publication-quality research papers.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...