Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63545
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Kakinada Institute of technological science
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Kakinada Institute of technological science
Concrete is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering due to its strength, durability, and versatility. However, the excessive utilization of natural aggregates in concrete production has resulted in depletion of natural resources and environmental degradation.. The cost of making concrete is going up because the prices of cement, sand and big rocks are rising. Using much sand and rocks is also causing worries about running out of these resources and harming the environment. So finding other waste materials to use of these rocks is an important area of research. In view of sustainable construction practices, the present study focuses on the utilization of OPKS and Coconut Endocarp as partial replacement materials for conventional coarse aggregate in M25 grade concrete. In this investigation, Oil Palm Kernel Shell was used as partial replacement of coarse aggregate at replacement levels of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, along with a constant addition of 3% Coconut Endocarp. The experimental program was carried out to evaluate both fresh and hardened properties of concrete. Fresh concrete properties were studied using slump test and compaction factor test, while hardened concrete properties were evaluated through compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength tests at curing periods of 7, 14, and 28 days. The compressive strength results demonstrated that the strength increased with curing age for all mixes. The conventional concrete achieved a 28-day compressive strength of 31.98 MPa, whereas the OPKS20% + 3% CEP mix attained the highest strength of 34.11 MPa, showing an increase of approximately 6.66%. Similarly, the split tensile strength increased from 3.42 MPa for conventional concrete to 3.56 MPa for the OPKS20% + 3% CEP mix, indicating an improvement of about 4.09%. The flexural strength also improved from 4.56 MPa to 4.82 MPa, corresponding to an enhancement of approximately 5.70%. Among all mixes, OPKS20% + 3% CEP was identified as the optimum replacement level for achieving improved strength and satisfactory workability. The study concludes that OPKS and Coconut Endocarp can be effectively utilized as sustainable alternative aggregate materials for the development of eco-friendly concrete suitable for structural applications.
KEYWORDS
The test results show that adding 20% Oil Palm Kernel Shell and 3% Coconut Endocarp to M25 grade concrete makes it stronger. When we look at all the mixes the mix with 20% Oil Palm Kernel Shell and 3% Coconut Endocarp is the best. It makes the concrete better at handling pressure, stretching and bending. The biggest difference we see is in how pressure the concrete can handle, which is about 6.66% better, than regular concrete. Oil Palm Kernel Shell and Coconut Endocarp really make M25 grade concrete perform better.
Ø 1. Abdullah, A. A. A., & Abdul Rahman, I. (2011). *Performance of oil palm shell as coarse aggregate in lightweight concrete*. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 6(2), 123–135. Ø 2. Mannan, M. A., & Ganapathy, C. (2002). *Engineering properties of concrete with oil palm shell as coarse aggregate*. Construction and Building Materials, 16(1), 29–34. Ø 3. Teo, D. C. L., Mannan, M. A., & Kurian, V. J. (2006). *Structural concrete using oil palm shell lightweight aggregate*. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 1(1), 45–56. Ø 4. Olanipekun, E. A., Olusola, K. O., & Ata, O. (2006). *A comparative study of concrete properties using coconut shell and palm kernel shell as coarse aggregates*. Building and Environment, 41(3), 297–301. Ø 5. Gunasekaran, K., Annadurai, R., & Kumar, P. S. (2012). *Long-term study on compressive and bond strength of coconut shell aggregate concrete*. Construction and Building Materials, 28(1), 208–215. Ø 6. Gunasekaran, K., Kumar, P. S., & Lakshmipathy, M. (2011). *Mechanical and bond properties of coconut shell concrete*. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 92–98. Ø 7. Amarnath, Y., & Ramachandrudu, C. (2014). *Properties of concrete with coconut shell as aggregate replacement*. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(3), 21–27. Ø 8. Basri, H. B., Mannan, M. A., & Zain, M. F. M. (1999). *Concrete using waste oil palm shells as aggregate*. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(4), 619–622. Ø 9. Shafigh, P., Jumaat, M. Z., & Mahmud, H. (2011). *Oil palm shell as a lightweight aggregate for production high strength lightweight concrete*. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1848–1853.
Publication Date
5/20/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...