Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66928
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Civil Engineering Department
P.E.S College of Engineering, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, M.S.
Civil Engineering Department
P.E.S College of Engineering, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, M.S.
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) can improve placement in congested structural members while reducing the need for mechanical vibration. This study investigates SCC incorporating Class F fly ash as a 30% cement replacement and granite waste as a partial replacement of natural fine aggregate at 20–60%. An ordinary Portland cement control and a fly-ash blended control were compared with seven granite-waste mixtures. Fresh-state performance was assessed using slump flow, while compressive strength was measured at 7, 28, 90, 180 and 365 days and split tensile and flexural strengths at 28, 90 and 180 days. All mixtures maintained satisfactory flowability, with slump-flow values of 745–770 mm. The F30G30 mixture produced the highest compressive strength at 28, 180 and 365 days, reaching 46.5, 59.0 and 64.2 MPa, respectively. Split tensile strength was also highest at F30G30, whereas flexural strength peaked at F30G35. The combined results indicate that approximately 30–35% granite-waste replacement with 30% fly ash provides a balanced fresh and hardened performance for the investigated SCC system.
KEYWORDS
• Class F fly ash and granite waste can be incorporated successfully into SCC while maintaining the required high flowability. • Slump-flow values remained between 745 and 770 mm, demonstrating effective fresh-state control through mixture proportioning and superplasticizer adjustment. • The 30% fly-ash control developed lower early-age compressive strength than the ordinary Portland cement control, but its later-age performance improved substantially. • Moderate granite-waste replacement improved compressive strength through filler action, particle packing and aggregate–paste interlocking, whereas higher replacement progressively reduced strength. • F30G30 produced the most favourable compressive response, reaching 46.5 MPa at 28 days, 59.0 MPa at 180 days and 64.2 MPa at 365 days. • Split tensile strength was highest near 30% granite-waste replacement, while flexural strength reached its maximum at F30G35. • The combined performance indicates that approximately 30–35% granite-waste replacement with 30% fly ash provides a balanced engineering response for the investigated SCC system. • The material combination offers a route to reduce Portland cement consumption and natural fine-aggregate demand while retaining structural performance.
[1] Bisht, K., Kabeer, K.I.S.A., Ramana, P.V., 2020. Gainful utilization of waste glass for production of sulphuric acid resistance concrete. Construction and Building Materials 235, 117486. [2] Jain, A., Siddique, S., Gupta, T., Jain, S., Sharma, R.K., Chaudhary, S., 2020. Evaluation of concrete containing waste plastic shredded fibers: Ductility properties. Structural Concrete. [3] Jain, K.L., Sancheti, G., Gupta, L.K., 2020. Durability performance of waste granite and glass powder added concrete. Construction and Building Materials 252, 119075. [4] Kara De Maeijer, P., Craeye, B., Snellings, R., Kazemi-Kamyab, H., Loots, M., Janssens, K., Nuyts, G., 2020. Effect of ultra-fine fly ash on concrete performance and durability. Construction and Building Materials 263, 120493. [5] Ostrowski, K., Stefaniuk, D., Sadowski, Ł., Krzywiński, K., Gicala, M., Różańska, M., 2020. Potential use of granite waste sourced from rock processing for the application as coarse aggregate in high-performance self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials 238, 117794. [6] Zulcao, R., Calmon, J.L., Rebello, T.A., Vieira, D.R., 2020. Life cycle assessment of the ornamental stone processing waste use in cement-based building materials. Construction and Building Materials 257, 119523. [7] Apeh, J.A., 2019. Properties of self-compacting concrete containing granite dust particles. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters 10(2), 34-41. [8] AzariJafari, H., Taheri Amiri, M.J., Ashrafian, A., Rasekh, H., Barforooshi, M.J., Berenjian, J., 2019. Ternary blended cement: An eco-friendly alternative to improve resistivity of high-performance self-consolidating concrete against elevated temperature. Journal of Cleaner Production 223, 575-586. [9] Bisht, K., Ramana, P.V., 2019. Waste to resource conversion of crumb rubber for production of sulphuric acid resistant concrete. Construction and Building Materials 194, 276-286. [10] Burgos, D.M., Guzman, A., Delvasto, S., 2019. Assessment of the performance of SCC incorporating volcanic materials in a sodium sulfate environment. Construction and Building Materials 195, 52-65.
Publication Date
8/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...