Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60090
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Email on mobile has become a dominant communic- ation channel for healthcare professionals, yet its constrained interface and context of use amplify vulnerability to social engineering attacks, especially phishing. This paper reports the development and empirical validation of the Healthcare Workers Phishing Risk Exposure (HWPRE) taxonomy, a 2Ã2 framework that positions individuals by (i) general email phishing susceptibility; and (ii) ability to detect mobile-specific phishing cues. We followed a sequential three-phase design: (1) a Delphi study with cybersecurity subject matter experts to validate mobile-relevant phishing indicators and components of a susceptibility index; (2) a pilot to refine instruments and procedures; as well as (3) a large-scale study ( =300 healthcare workers) using scenario- based assessments on smartphone-generated email stimuli. We present the construction of the Healthcare Workers Email Phishing Susceptibility Index (HWEPSI), reliability/validity evidence, and statistical analyses relating HWPRE placement to role, experience, medical departments, prior training, and demographic indicators. The results show significant heterogeneity across departments and experience bands; in addition, the ability to recognize mobile cues does not follow uniformly with general susceptibility. We discuss implications for targeted Security Education, Training, and Awareness (SETA) programs and measurement driven program evaluation. We conclude with practical guidance for integrating HWPRE into organizational phishing defense and directions for future research.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...