Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60408
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Industrial automation systems are increasingly targeted by cyber-physical threats, with engineers often serving as the first line of defense. The constrained interfaces of Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs), coupled with operational urgency, amplify vulnerability to social engineering and misconfiguration risks. This paper reports the development and empirical validation of the Automation Engineers Risk Exposure (AERE) taxonomy, a 2×2 framework that positions individuals by (i) general susceptibility to industrial control system (ICS) risks; and (ii) ability to detect automation-specific threat cues. We followed a sequential three-phase design: (1) a Delphi study with cybersecurity and automation experts to validate ICS-relevant threat indicators and components of a susceptibility index; (2) a pilot to refine instruments and procedures; and (3) a large-scale study (N=250 automation engineers) using scenario-based assessments on simulated ICS environments. We present the construction of the Automation Engineers Control Risk Susceptibility Index (AECRSI), reliability/validity evidence, and statistical analyses relating AERE placement to role, experience, department, prior training, and demographic indicators. Results show significant heterogeneity across departments and experience bands; detection ability does not uniformly correlate with general susceptibility. We discuss implications for targeted Security Education, Training, and Awareness (SETA) programs in industrial automation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...