Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM47377
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Waste from construction and demolition accounts for a significant portion of global solid waste, with the majority of it ending up in landfills. Processing this debris and using it to make fresh concrete is a useful and profitable approach to manage it. Effective methods for utilising construction and demolition debris in concrete have been investigated by researchers. The study aimed to test the quality of recycled materials by evaluating their strength, water absorption, density, and the type of concrete they can produce. Compared to natural coarse aggregates, recycled aggregates from leftover concrete are heavier, more angular, and absorb more water. Strength and load-bearing capacity are enhanced as a result. To improve workability and examine their endurance, more research is necessary.    This study explores the properties of recycled aggregates and focuses on developing concrete mixes incorporating them to minimize the environmental impact of the construction industry. It also compares concrete made with recycled and natural aggregates to evaluate their strength, Durability and Workability. We replaced natural aggregate concrete with 100% recycled aggregate concrete. Natural aggregate concrete has a higher compressive strength than recycled aggregate concrete.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/9/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...