Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60425
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder and a major public health concern worldwide. Early prediction of diabetes risk from routinely collected clinical attributes can support timely intervention and reduce long-term complications. This paper presents DiabetesML, a comparative study of classical machine learning models for diabetes risk prediction using the Pima Indians Diabetes Dataset. The system evaluates Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest classifiers on eight clinical features including pregnancies, glucose level, blood pressure, skin thickness, insulin, body mass index (BMI), diabetes pedigree function, and age. Logistic Regression achieves the highest test accuracy of 78.57%, while Random Forest and Decision Tree achieve 75.97% and 69.48%, respectively, on a stratified 80–20 train–test split. In addition to accuracy, models are assessed using precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and confusion matrices to provide a comprehensive performance anal-ysis. The best-performing model is deployed via a Flask-based web application with an HTML frontend, enabling end-users to submit clinical parameters and receive real-time diabetes risk predictions. The proposed system demonstrates the practicality of integrating classical machine learning with lightweight web technologies for accessible clinical decision support.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/24/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...