Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM61949
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-28
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
BBA
BBA
BBA
BBA
The rapid proliferation of digital and social media platforms has fundamentally restructured modern consumer behavior particularly within saturated and competitive brand markets. This research paper examines how platforms including Instagram TikTok YouTube Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) influence consumer perceptions purchase intentions brand loyalty and post-purchase advocacy. Through a systematic synthesis of contemporary marketing literature (2020,2026) and real-world brand case studies the study identifies five key mechanisms of influence: influencer marketing user-generated content social proof signals personalized algorithm-driven advertising and real-time engagement. Findings demonstrate that modern consumers have evolved from passive recipients of brand communications to active co-creators of brand narratives. In competitive markets where product differentiation is minimal social media presence often determines market share. Brands that succeed leverage two-way communication emotional storytelling community building and rapid response mechanisms. However the paper also identifies negative behavioral consequences including fear of missing out (FOMO) social comparison-induced anxiety impulse purchasing digital fatigue and susceptibility to misinformation. The integrated theoretical framework combining the Theory of Planned Behavior Elaboration Likelihood Model Uses and Gratifications Theory and social proof principles effectively explains these phenomena. The paper concludes with actionable managerial recommendations: invest in community management over pure advertising prioritize micro-influencers for authenticity monitor sentiment metrics beyond vanity indicators and design for post-purchase advocacy loops. Future research directions include the impact of AI-generated virtual influencers and regulatory challenges surrounding undisclosed brand partnerships.
KEYWORDS
Digital and social media have irrevocably transformed modern consumer behavior. In competitive brand markets where products increasingly resemble one another, the battleground has shifted from features and price to perceptions, relationships, and social validation. Brands that understand and respect the behavioral mechanisms of social media , providing value, building community, enabling advocacy , will thrive. Brands that exploit behavioral vulnerabilities , manipulating FOMO, encouraging compulsive consumption, flooding consumers with intrusive ads , may achieve short-term gains but will face long-term erosion of trust and eventual regulatory constraint. For consumers, the challenge is to navigate this environment mindfully, recognizing when purchase decisions are driven by genuine need versus manufactured social pressure. For researchers, the task is to continue illuminating both the promises and perils of our digitally mediated marketplace. The influence of social media on consumer behavior is not a passing trend; it is the new baseline. Understanding it is not optional for marketers, policymakers, or consumers , it is essential.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179,211. Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Instagram and beauty product purchase intention: The mediating role of subjective norms. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(4), 892,907. Cialdini, R. B. (2021). Influence, new and expanded: The psychology of persuasion. Harper Business. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798,828. Digital Global Report. (2025). Global social media statistics 2025. DataReportal. Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1968). Consumer behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117,140. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., Hameed, Z., & Khan, I. U. (2023). Social media-induced compulsive buying: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103,118. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995,1006. Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(4), 857,882. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509,523. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241,251. Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, Y. K. (2021). Ad clutter on social media: Antecedents and consequences of brand avoidance. Journal of Advertising, 50(3), 289,305. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2022). FOMO and impulse buying: A cross-platform analysis of social media effects. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 11(2), 445,458. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 101,117. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2020). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(1), 70,82.
Publication Date
4/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...