Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65561

Digital Banking Frauds and the RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme: An Empirical Study of Victim Behaviour, Reporting Patterns and Grievance Awareness among Young Urban Users in Hyderabad

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65561

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65561

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DKMR

Dr. K. Mallikarjuna Rao

Associate Professor & Head, Department of Commerce

, Government City College (Autonomous), Hyderabad

Download Author Certificate
PS

Pasupula Shekhar

Department of Commerce

, Government City College (Autonomous), Hyderabad

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital banking in India has been accompanied by a parallel surge in cyber-enabled financial frauds, placing millions of users at risk. Despite the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) operationalising the Integrated Ombudsman Scheme (RBIOS) in November 2021 as a unified grievance redressal mechanism, awareness of and recourse to this scheme remains critically low. This study investigates the incidence and typology of digital banking frauds, victim reporting behaviour, satisfaction with bank grievance redressal, and awareness of the RBIOS among 74 digital banking users in Hyderabad through a structured questionnaire survey administered via Google Forms. Findings reveal that 60.8% of respondents had experienced digital fraud, with UPI-related fraud, phishing, and card or ATM skimming emerging as the most prevalent categories. Alarmingly, 50% of fraud victims did not report the incident to their bank. Only 23% of respondents had ever approached the RBIOS, while 66.2% were entirely unaware of its existence. Satisfaction with bank grievance redressal was predominantly neutral (43.2%), indicating systemic gaps in institutional responsiveness. The study underscores an urgent need for targeted financial literacy interventions, proactive dissemination of the RBIOS mechanism, and strengthened regulatory oversight to protect digital banking consumers. The findings carry direct implications for banking regulators, policy makers, and financial institutions operating in the rapidly evolving Indian digital payments ecosystem.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Digital banking fraud RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme phishing UPI fraud grievance redressal financial literacy India

Cite This Article

Dr. K. Mallikarjuna Rao, Pasupula Shekhar, "Digital Banking Frauds and the RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme: An Empirical Study of Victim Behaviour, Reporting Patterns and Grievance Awareness among Young Urban Users in Hyderabad," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-10, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65561

Full Article/Conclusion

This study set out to examine the landscape of digital banking fraud experiences, reporting behaviour, grievance satisfaction, and awareness of the RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme among young urban banking users in Hyderabad. The evidence gathered from 74 respondents reveals a troubling picture: a majority of users have experienced digital fraud, half of victims do not report incidents to their banks, institutional satisfaction is largely neutral rather than positive, and two-thirds of users are entirely unaware of the RBIOS, India's flagship unified banking grievance mechanism.

References

Anderson, R., Barton, C., Böhme, R., Clayton, R., van Eeten, M., Levi, M., Moore, T., & Savage, S. (2013). Measuring the cost of cybercrime. In R. Böhme (Ed.), The economics of information security and privacy (pp. 265–300). Springer. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2018). Sound practices: Implications of fintech developments for banks and bank supervisors. Bank for International Settlements. Bhasin, M. L. (2016). Audit committee and corporate governance: Exploring cyber frauds in Indian banks. Business, Management and Economics Research, 2(5), 90–104. Garg, A., & Bhardwaj, S. (2021). Rising digital banking frauds in India: A study of cybercrime patterns and regulatory responses. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 840–856. Herley, C. (2009). So long, and no thanks for the externalities: The rational rejection of security advice by users. Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, ACM, 133–144. Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). (2024). Annual report on cybercrime statistics. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Jagatic, T., Johnson, N., Jakobsson, M., & Menczer, F. (2007). Social phishing. Communications of the ACM, 50(10), 94–100. Jakobsson, M., & Myers, S. (Eds.). (2006). Phishing and countermeasures: Understanding the increasing problem of electronic identity theft. John Wiley & Sons. Kaur, J., Sharma, S. K., & Singh, N. (2021). Procedural justice and customer satisfaction in banking complaint management: Evidence from India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 612–634. Malhotra, P., & Singh, B. (2009). The impact of internet banking on bank performance and risk: The Indian experience. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 2(4), 43–62. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). (2023). Digital India: Progress report. Government of India.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/26/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...