Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67630

Digital Marketplaces for Farm-to-Consumer Trade: A Comparative Review of E-Commerce Platforms, Architectures, and Adoption Barriers in Agricultural Supply Chains

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67630

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67630

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Anand Kasar

Anand Kasar

Master's of Computer Application

ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research

Download Author Certificate
PS

Pratik Salke

Master's of Computer Application

ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research

Download Co-Author Certificate
YP

Yagnika Patel

Master's of Computer Application

ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research

Download Co-Author Certificate
SK

Sainath Kedase

Master's of Computer Application

ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

SD

Shivani Dhabadge

Master's of Computer Application

ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

In most developing economies, farm produce still reaches consumers through a long relay of commission agents, traders and wholesalers, and each of them keeps a share of the price. Buyers end up paying more, while growers are left with a thin margin. Wider internet access and cheaper smartphones have opened another route: web and app-based marketplaces where farmers sell directly to households, retailers and institutional buyers. This paper draws on two independent studies of agricultural e-commerce and reads them together as one consolidated review. It traces how digital trade moved from general retail into farming, sets out the stakeholder roles and technical building blocks a farm-to-consumer platform needs, and compares deployed systems, from large state-backed markets such as India’s eNAM and China’s Pinduoduo to smaller ventures such as Harvest Port, Farmigo, AgriChain, Fresh Shop, Procurant and iTradeNetwork, with a community-oriented “Farmer Gateway” concept built on cooperative storage and last-mile vending points. Recurring obstacles are identified, including patchy rural connectivity, low digital and financial literacy, distrust of online payment, language exclusion and weak regulatory support. The strategies proposed across the literature are then summarised: offline-capable applications, tiered pricing, multilingual interfaces, cooperative-led training, and blockchain- or AI-assisted transparency tools. The review closes with research gaps, chiefly the shortage of comparative, cross-regional evaluation needed to guide inclusive digital agricultural trade.

KEYWORDS

: E-commerce Agricultural Supply Chains Digital Marketplaces Farm-to-Consumer Trade Rural Development Farmer Empowerment Digital Inclusion Cooperative Platforms Supply Chain Digitalisation Policy Intervention.

Cite This Article

Anand Kasar, Pratik Salke, Yagnika Patel, Sainath Kedase, Shivani Dhabadge, "Digital Marketplaces for Farm-to-Consumer Trade: A Comparative Review of E-Commerce Platforms, Architectures, and Adoption Barriers in Agricultural Supply Chains," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-5, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67630

Full Article/Conclusion

Both studies reach a similar conclusion from different directions. Digital marketplaces can shorten the distance between farmer and consumer, raise the share of the final price that reaches the grower, and give buyers fresher produce at a transparent price, but only when the platform suits the infrastructure, literacy and trust levels of the community using it. Large state-backed systems such as eNAM show what is possible at national scale. Leaner cooperative designs such as the Farmer Gateway show that the same disintermediation can be achieved with a lighter technical footprint, using shared vending points and offline-tolerant apps instead of assuming fast connectivity everywhere. Neither approach alone removes the lasting barriers of rural infrastructure, digital literacy, cost and language. Those will need coordinated effort from governments, technology providers, cooperatives and financial institutions. With that support, digital farm-to-consumer trade can plausibly become a lasting contributor to rural incomes, affordable food and more resilient supply chains.

References

[1] FAO, The Digitalization of Agriculture: Concepts, Drivers and Future Pathways, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2020. [2] World Bank, ICT in Agriculture: Connecting Smallholders to Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016. [3] McKinsey & Company, “AgTech: Breaking down the digital agriculture opportunity,” McKinsey & Company Report, 2021. [4] Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, e-NAM Platform Overview, Government of India, 2021. [5] KPMG India, AgriTech – Towards Transforming Indian Agriculture, KPMG Report, 2020. [6] UNCTAD, Digital Economy Report 2019: Value Creation and Capture, United Nations, 2019. [7] Deloitte, Smart Agriculture: Bridging the Digital Divide in Farming, Deloitte Insights, 2021. [8] OECD, Enhancing Market Access for Smallholders through E-commerce Platforms, OECD Publishing, 2022. [9] IFPRI, Digital Opportunities in Agriculture: COVID-19 Response and Beyond, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2020. [10] A. A. Alyoubi, “E-commerce in developing countries,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 65, pp. 479–483, 2015.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/2/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

12

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...