Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67630
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Master's of Computer Application
ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research
Master's of Computer Application
ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research
Master's of Computer Application
ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research
Master's of Computer Application
ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research
Master's of Computer Application
ASM's Institute of Business Management and Research
In most developing economies, farm produce still reaches consumers through a long relay of commission agents, traders and wholesalers, and each of them keeps a share of the price. Buyers end up paying more, while growers are left with a thin margin. Wider internet access and cheaper smartphones have opened another route: web and app-based marketplaces where farmers sell directly to households, retailers and institutional buyers. This paper draws on two independent studies of agricultural e-commerce and reads them together as one consolidated review. It traces how digital trade moved from general retail into farming, sets out the stakeholder roles and technical building blocks a farm-to-consumer platform needs, and compares deployed systems, from large state-backed markets such as India’s eNAM and China’s Pinduoduo to smaller ventures such as Harvest Port, Farmigo, AgriChain, Fresh Shop, Procurant and iTradeNetwork, with a community-oriented “Farmer Gateway” concept built on cooperative storage and last-mile vending points. Recurring obstacles are identified, including patchy rural connectivity, low digital and financial literacy, distrust of online payment, language exclusion and weak regulatory support. The strategies proposed across the literature are then summarised: offline-capable applications, tiered pricing, multilingual interfaces, cooperative-led training, and blockchain- or AI-assisted transparency tools. The review closes with research gaps, chiefly the shortage of comparative, cross-regional evaluation needed to guide inclusive digital agricultural trade.
KEYWORDS
Both studies reach a similar conclusion from different directions. Digital marketplaces can shorten the distance between farmer and consumer, raise the share of the final price that reaches the grower, and give buyers fresher produce at a transparent price, but only when the platform suits the infrastructure, literacy and trust levels of the community using it. Large state-backed systems such as eNAM show what is possible at national scale. Leaner cooperative designs such as the Farmer Gateway show that the same disintermediation can be achieved with a lighter technical footprint, using shared vending points and offline-tolerant apps instead of assuming fast connectivity everywhere. Neither approach alone removes the lasting barriers of rural infrastructure, digital literacy, cost and language. Those will need coordinated effort from governments, technology providers, cooperatives and financial institutions. With that support, digital farm-to-consumer trade can plausibly become a lasting contributor to rural incomes, affordable food and more resilient supply chains.
[1] FAO, The Digitalization of Agriculture: Concepts, Drivers and Future Pathways, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2020. [2] World Bank, ICT in Agriculture: Connecting Smallholders to Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016. [3] McKinsey & Company, “AgTech: Breaking down the digital agriculture opportunity,” McKinsey & Company Report, 2021. [4] Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, e-NAM Platform Overview, Government of India, 2021. [5] KPMG India, AgriTech – Towards Transforming Indian Agriculture, KPMG Report, 2020. [6] UNCTAD, Digital Economy Report 2019: Value Creation and Capture, United Nations, 2019. [7] Deloitte, Smart Agriculture: Bridging the Digital Divide in Farming, Deloitte Insights, 2021. [8] OECD, Enhancing Market Access for Smallholders through E-commerce Platforms, OECD Publishing, 2022. [9] IFPRI, Digital Opportunities in Agriculture: COVID-19 Response and Beyond, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2020. [10] A. A. Alyoubi, “E-commerce in developing countries,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 65, pp. 479–483, 2015.
Publication Date
10/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
12
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...