Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67772
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology
DOC MIND provides local, evidence-driven review of resumes, invoices, contracts and scanned documents. It validates uploads, extracts source text and records domain checks. Findings include severity, evidence, score impact and recommended action. Unsupported or incompletely assessed inputs receive no ordinary health score. Human decisions remain separate from automated findings. Related revisions use explicit lineage and compatible audit runs, preventing missing analysis from appearing as improvement. Next.js, FastAPI and SQLite support the application; optional Ollama generation assists document interaction. Configurable encryption and tenant roles support controlled operation. The system passes 187 backend regressions. A developer-labelled 33-document corpus records 16 true positives, zero false positives and zero missed findings. These diagnostics do not establish independent real-document accuracy or certify correctness.
KEYWORDS
DOC MIND implements a local document-review application that connects validated intake, canonical extraction, configured domain audits and human decision records. Its principal objective is not simply to generate more text about a file, but to make the basis and limits of a review inspectable. Supported documents receive explainable findings and conditional health scores; unsupported or insufficiently assessed inputs retain explicit uncertainty. The architecture combines Next.js and React with FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, SQLite, extraction libraries and optional Ollama generation. These are established technologies; the project contribution lies in their orchestration with a check ledger, audit snapshots, evidence identities and conservative revision states. Regression and acceptance results demonstrate concrete implementation behaviours including tenant isolation, role-aware controls, persistence and encrypted fixture recovery. The corrected synthetic cases provide useful diagnostics for currency handling and clause negation. However, successful tests do not prove complete legal understanding, financial authenticity, recruitment effectiveness or independently established real-document accuracy. The system remains an assistive workflow with human responsibility for consequential decisions. The integrated Finding to Evidence to Decision to Revision to Comparison workflow is the project's strongest practical distinction. It allows a reviewer to investigate a concern, record a response and check a related revision without treating missing analysis as success. Further evaluation should extend this traceability to consented real documents, original-page evidence visualization and carefully measured long-running local operation.
[1] P. Lewis et al. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020, pp. 9459-9474. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401 [2] N. Reimers and I. Gurevych. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. EMNLP-IJCNLP, 2019, pp. 3982-3992. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1410 [3] J. Johnson, M. Douze and H. Jegou. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(3), 2021, pp. 535-547; preprint 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08734 [4] Tesseract OCR contributors. Tesseract User Manual. Official documentation. https://tesseract-ocr.github.io/tessdoc/ [5] Microsoft. Document layout analysis with Document Intelligence. Official documentation. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/document-intelligence/prebuilt/layout [6] Adobe. Use AI Assistant in Acrobat. Official product documentation. https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/desktop/use-acrobat-ai/generative-ai-features/ai-get-answers.html [7] Qwen Team. Qwen3 Think Deeper Act Faster. Model release and local inference overview, 2025. https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen3/ [8] Ollama. API Introduction. Official local inference API documentation. https://docs.ollama.com/api/introduction [9] FastAPI contributors. FastAPI Documentation. Official API framework documentation. https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/ [10] Vercel. Next.js Documentation. Official web framework documentation. https://nextjs.org/docs
Publication Date
10/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...