Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67772

DOCMIND AI

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67772

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-12

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67772

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SE

Subramanian E

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology

Download Author Certificate
DDG

Dharani Daran G

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology

Download Co-Author Certificate
BKMS

Bharath Kumar M S

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology

Download Co-Author Certificate
HS

Haani Syed

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology

Download Co-Author Certificate
AVN

Atharsh Vikram N

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

DOC MIND provides local, evidence-driven review of resumes, invoices, contracts and scanned documents. It validates uploads, extracts source text and records domain checks. Findings include severity, evidence, score impact and recommended action. Unsupported or incompletely assessed inputs receive no ordinary health score. Human decisions remain separate from automated findings. Related revisions use explicit lineage and compatible audit runs, preventing missing analysis from appearing as improvement. Next.js, FastAPI and SQLite support the application; optional Ollama generation assists document interaction. Configurable encryption and tenant roles support controlled operation. The system passes 187 backend regressions. A developer-labelled 33-document corpus records 16 true positives, zero false positives and zero missed findings. These diagnostics do not establish independent real-document accuracy or certify correctness.

KEYWORDS

document intelligence explainable audit evidence provenance coverage-aware scoring revision comparison human review retrieval augmented generation local language models tenant isolation.

Cite This Article

Subramanian E, Dharani Daran G, Bharath Kumar M S, Haani Syed, Atharsh Vikram N, "DOCMIND AI," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-12, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67772

Full Article/Conclusion

DOC MIND implements a local document-review application that connects validated intake, canonical extraction, configured domain audits and human decision records. Its principal objective is not simply to generate more text about a file, but to make the basis and limits of a review inspectable. Supported documents receive explainable findings and conditional health scores; unsupported or insufficiently assessed inputs retain explicit uncertainty. The architecture combines Next.js and React with FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, SQLite, extraction libraries and optional Ollama generation. These are established technologies; the project contribution lies in their orchestration with a check ledger, audit snapshots, evidence identities and conservative revision states. Regression and acceptance results demonstrate concrete implementation behaviours including tenant isolation, role-aware controls, persistence and encrypted fixture recovery. The corrected synthetic cases provide useful diagnostics for currency handling and clause negation. However, successful tests do not prove complete legal understanding, financial authenticity, recruitment effectiveness or independently established real-document accuracy. The system remains an assistive workflow with human responsibility for consequential decisions. The integrated Finding to Evidence to Decision to Revision to Comparison workflow is the project's strongest practical distinction. It allows a reviewer to investigate a concern, record a response and check a related revision without treating missing analysis as success. Further evaluation should extend this traceability to consented real documents, original-page evidence visualization and carefully measured long-running local operation.

References

[1] P. Lewis et al. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020, pp. 9459-9474. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401 [2] N. Reimers and I. Gurevych. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. EMNLP-IJCNLP, 2019, pp. 3982-3992. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1410 [3] J. Johnson, M. Douze and H. Jegou. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(3), 2021, pp. 535-547; preprint 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08734 [4] Tesseract OCR contributors. Tesseract User Manual. Official documentation. https://tesseract-ocr.github.io/tessdoc/ [5] Microsoft. Document layout analysis with Document Intelligence. Official documentation. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/document-intelligence/prebuilt/layout [6] Adobe. Use AI Assistant in Acrobat. Official product documentation. https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/desktop/use-acrobat-ai/generative-ai-features/ai-get-answers.html [7] Qwen Team. Qwen3 Think Deeper Act Faster. Model release and local inference overview, 2025. https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen3/ [8] Ollama. API Introduction. Official local inference API documentation. https://docs.ollama.com/api/introduction [9] FastAPI contributors. FastAPI Documentation. Official API framework documentation. https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/ [10] Vercel. Next.js Documentation. Official web framework documentation. https://nextjs.org/docs

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/10/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...