Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM47092
Volume:
|
|
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Tree planting has emerged as a widely promoted strategy for mitigating climate change, often portrayed as a natural solution for capturing atmospheric carbon dioxide. This research paper critically examines the extent to which afforestation and reforestation efforts contribute to combating climate change. Drawing on recent scientific findings, global carbon sequestration data, and satellite monitoring advancements, the study explores both the potential benefits and limitations of tree planting as a climate mitigation tool. While trees do absorb and store significant amounts of CO₂, the overall impact varies greatly depending on species selection, geographic location, biodiversity considerations, and the longevity of carbon storage. Moreover, the paper highlights ecological risks such as soil carbon loss, biodiversity disruption, and albedo changes that may counteract climate gains if tree planting is poorly planned. The research concludes that while planting trees can play a valuable role in climate action, it must be integrated with broader strategies including emissions reduction, forest protection, and ecosystem restoration to be truly effective. Strategic, science-based implementation is essential to ensure that reforestation efforts deliver genuine and lasting climate benefits.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...