Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62653
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Economics
Acharya Nagarjuna University
Economics
Acharya Nagarjuna University
The study examines the occupational differences in perceptions, motivations, policy preferences and economic considerations influencing the adoption of electric two-wheelers in Vijayawada city of Andhra Pradesh. Based on primary data collected from 180 respondents, comprising 90 salaried employees and 90 self-employed individuals, the study employs a descriptive research design and simple percentage analysis for interpretation. The findings reveal that social influence and cost savings are the major drivers of adoption, while respondents strongly perceive electric two-wheelers as more economical over a five-year period compared to petrol scooters. Policy measures such as higher exchange or scrappage value are identified as the most effective incentive for encouraging adoption. The study also highlights that home charging is considered the most cost-effective option, although infrastructural and installation-related concerns persist, particularly among salaried employees. At the household level, EV adoption is largely associated with increased disposable income and improved mobility flexibility. However, high battery replacement cost remains the most significant financial concern across both occupational groups. The study concludes that while electric two-wheelers are widely perceived as economically beneficial, addressing infrastructure limitations and post-purchase cost uncertainties is essential for accelerating adoption.
KEYWORDS
It is evident from the overall analysis of all six tables that the adoption and perception of electric two-wheelers are primarily shaped by an interplay of economic benefits, policy incentives, infrastructure readiness and long-term cost expectations, with clear occupational variations between salaried and self-employed respondents. Across the findings, social influence and economic rationality emerge as the dominant drivers of adoption, where friends’ suggestions and perceived cost savings play a major role. At the same time, both groups strongly recognise the long-term affordability of electric two-wheelers compared to petrol scooters, with a majority expecting significant cost advantages over a five-year period. This reinforces the growing perception of EVs as a financially viable alternative rather than merely an environmental choice. Policy preferences further highlight that exchange or scrappage-based incentives are the most effective motivators for switching, indicating that respondents value tangible asset recovery over upfront subsidies. Tax exemptions and usage-related benefits also hold importance, but direct price reductions are comparatively less influential. The charging ecosystem analysis reveals that home charging is central to the economic advantage of EVs, particularly among self-employed respondents, while salaried individuals exhibit greater concern regarding installation costs, range anxiety and power reliability. This indicates that infrastructure quality and accessibility remain crucial determinants of adoption experience. At the household level, EV adoption is largely associated with improved disposable income and enhanced mobility flexibility, suggesting that users perceive EVs as tools for financial optimisation. Secondary benefits such as health savings and asset value appreciation are acknowledged but remain less prominent in decision-making. However, despite these positive perceptions, significant financial concerns persist, particularly regarding high battery replacement costs after warranty, followed by resale value uncertainty and limited repair ecosystem support. These concerns represent key psychological and economic barriers that may slow wider adoption unless addressed through policy and market interventions. The study reveals that while electric two-wheelers are increasingly viewed as economically advantageous and socially acceptable, sustained adoption depends on strengthening post-purchase financial security, improving service infrastructure and enhancing long-term asset confidence among users. Occupational differences further indicate that salaried respondents are more influenced by social and infrastructural factors, whereas self-employed respondents respond more strongly to direct financial implications and cost recovery mechanisms. Based on the findings, it is suggested that policy interventions should focus more on strengthening exchange or scrappage-linked incentives, as respondents show higher responsiveness to asset recovery benefits compared to direct purchase subsidies. Improving the battery ecosystem through price stabilisation mechanisms, extended warranties and development of affordable replacement options can significantly reduce the primary financial concern affecting adoption decisions. Expansion of reliable charging infrastructure, particularly affordable home charging solutions and stable public charging networks, is essential to enhance user confidence. Further, strengthening local servicing ecosystems through trained third-party repair networks can reduce long-term maintenance concerns and improve resale market confidence. Awareness programmes highlighting total cost savings, health benefits and long-term household economic advantages may also help in reinforcing positive perceptions and accelerating adoption across both salaried and self-employed groups.
1. The Energy and Resources Institute, & Society for Development Studies. (2019). Faster adoption of electric vehicles in India: Perspective of consumers and industry. The Energy and Resources Institute. 2. Pratyush, & Krishna Kishore, S. V. (2024). A study on the factors influencing adoption of electric two-wheelers in tier-1 cities. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 9(3), g462–g470. 3. Natarajan, B., Sasidharan, C., Patil, A., Varun, B. R., Dhupar, A., & Kumar, H. (2022). Catalysing the market transformation of electric two-wheelers in India. Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy. 4. Praveen, S. K., Rani, S., Allappanavar, R. M., Ganesha, K. S., & Shashank, S. V. (2025). Adoption intention for electric two-wheelers in Bangalore: The role of subsidy reductions, environmental concern and innovation preference. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 29(S6), 1–13. 5. Bhat, F. A., & Verma, A. (2024). Electric two-wheeler adoption in India – A discrete choice analysis of motivators and barriers affecting the potential electric two-wheeler buyers. Transport Policy, 152, 118–131. 6. Maheswari, R. U. (2025). Economic feasibility of electric vehicle adoption among urban commuters: A cost-benefit analysis. Aureole, XVII, 53–60. 7. Ali, M. M. M., & Deshmukh, A. A. (2023). A study on consumer perception towards adoption of e-vehicle in Sangli city. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 11(2), 1798–1807. 8. Kumar, T. D., & Madhiyarasi, S. (2024). A study on consumer usage and preference toward electric two wheeler. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(10), 4866–4870. 9. Kalimuthu, M., & Vekashine, B. (2025). Study on factors influencing consumer behaviour towards electric two-wheelers in Coimbatore city. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 13(6), b471–b475. 10. Kulkarni, A. V., Kudachimath, B. S., & Ingalagi, S. (2024). Embracing electric two-wheelers: A transformative shift in consumer adoption of eco-friendly transportation technology. ITM Web of Conferences, 68, 01027. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246801027 Yadav, G. K. (2020). Factors affecting adoption of electric bikes shared services in India. International Journal of Management, 11(11), 1772–1786. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.11.2020.168
Publication Date
5/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...