Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68186
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kings College of Engineering, Punalkulam
Smart campuses connect classroom projectors, attendance terminals, surveillance cameras, laboratory sensors, and hostel Wi-Fi infrastructure to a shared network. Detecting intrusions in such environments normally requires pooling traffic records from every department in one place, which raises privacy, bandwidth, and governance concerns. This paper proposes EdgeGuard-FL, a federated learning framework in which each campus edge node trains a lightweight intrusion-detection model on its own traffic and shares only protected model updates with a coordinating server. The design combines flow-level feature extraction, local anomaly and classification models, clipped and noised updates, trust-weighted aggregation to resist poisoned clients, and a drift monitor that triggers re-training when traffic behaviour changes. A graded response policy maps detector output to log, alert, rate-limit, or isolate actions. The paper defines the threat model, architecture, dataset and partitioning plan, candidate detection models, evaluation metrics, and deployment safeguards. As no implementation experiment is claimed, the results section specifies a reproducible evaluation plan rather than reporting invented measurements. EdgeGuard-FL aims to provide a practical foundation for collaborative network defence that balances detection quality, privacy, communication cost, and operational simplicity.
KEYWORDS
EdgeGuard-FL proposes a privacy-conscious approach to collaborative intrusion detection in smart campus networks. Its central idea is to let edge nodes learn from one another's experience without sharing raw traffic. Local detection, clipped and noised updates, trust-weighted aggregation, drift monitoring, and a graded response policy work together to reduce privacy exposure and the effect of faulty or malicious participants. The framework also requires independent authorisation for enforcement actions, careful logging, source-separated evaluation, and explicit measurement of communication and latency cost. The approach is modular and suitable for a final-year CSE prototype that begins with replayed benchmark data and gradually adds federated defences. Because the framework has not yet been experimentally validated, its effectiveness remains a research question rather than a proven result. A completed implementation should use a well-labelled benchmark, report actual metrics, analyse errors, and state its limitations clearly. Secure collaborative detection requires layered controls and continuous evaluation; a learned detector is valuable, but it cannot replace network segmentation, patching, and access control.
[1] H. B. McMahan et al., "Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data," in Proc. AISTATS, PMLR vol. 54, pp. 1273–1282, 2017. [2] T. Li et al., "Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks," in Proc. Machine Learning and Systems (MLSys), 2020. [3] P. Kairouz et al., "Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning," Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 14, no. 1–2, pp. 1–210, 2021. [4] C. Dwork and A. Roth, "The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy," Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 3–4, pp. 211–407, 2014. [5] K. Bonawitz et al., "Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning," in Proc. ACM CCS, pp. 1175–1191, 2017. [6] M. Abadi et al., "Deep Learning with Differential Privacy," in Proc. ACM CCS, pp. 308–318, 2016. [7] Y. Mirsky et al., "Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detection," in Proc. NDSS, 2018. [8] I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, "Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization," in Proc. ICISSP, 2018. [9] P. Blanchard et al., "Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017. [10] E. Bagdasaryan et al., "How To Backdoor Federated Learning," in Proc. AISTATS, PMLR vol. 108, 2020.
Publication Date
10/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...