Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM55936
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The increasing scarcity of natural construction resources and the accumulation of industrial waste have encouraged the use of alternative materials in concrete. Several experimental studies have examined the physical and chemical behavior of waste materials when used as partial replacements, leading to improved strength characteristics. Recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), obtained from crushed concrete debris, closely resembles natural aggregate properties. Sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA), a finely divided by-product of burnt sugarcane bagasse, is suitable for partial cement replacement. Marble waste powder (MWP), generated during marble cutting and polishing, can be effectively used as a fine aggregate substitute. In this study, concrete mixes were prepared by partially replacing cement with SBA, fine aggregate with MWP, and coarse aggregate with RCA at different proportions. Strength and non-destructive tests were performed to assess performance. The results indicate that compressive and flexural strengths increase initially and reach maximum values at 20% SBA, 20% MWP, and 25% RCA, after which strength decreases. The highest split tensile strength was observed for the mix containing 20% SBA, 40% MWP, and 25% RCA, while all other mixes showed satisfactory behavior.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...