Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62612
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-16
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Department of Physiotherapy
Akal University
Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc (PIVD) remains a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder, It is a common cause of low back pain associated with radiculopathy, leading to pain, functional disability, restricted lumbar range of motion (ROM), and impaired neural mobility. Physiotherapy is widely recommended as the first-line conservative treatment, with lumbar exercises and manual therapy being commonly used interventions. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar exercise and manual therapy on disability, lumbar ROM, and neural mobility in patients with lumbar PIVD. Methods: A review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparative studies, and systematic reviews was conducted. Studies including adults with lumbar PIVD were analyzed. Interventions included lumbar stabilization exercises, manual therapy (mobilization, manipulation, and soft tissue techniques), and neural mobilization. Outcome measures assessed were disability (Oswestry Disability Index), pain, lumbar ROM, and neural mobility (Straight Leg Raise test). Results: Both lumbar exercises and manual therapy significantly reduced pain and disability and improved ROM and neural mobility. Lumbar exercises enhanced spinal stability and functional capacity, while manual therapy provided immediate pain relief and improved joint mobility. Neural mobilization improved nerve mobility and reduced radicular symptoms. Combined interventions demonstrated superior outcomes compared to single treatment approaches. Conclusion: Lumbar exercise and manual therapy are effective in improving disability, ROM, and neural mobility in patients with lumbar PIVD. A combined physiotherapy approach provides better and more sustained clinical outcomes than isolated interventions.
KEYWORDS
The present review concludes that both lumbar exercise and manual therapy are effective interventions in the management of patients with Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc (PIVD), contributing significantly to reductions in pain and disability, as well as improvements in range of motion (ROM) and neural mobility. However, the evidence consistently demonstrates that a combined, multimodal approach integrating lumbar stabilization exercises, manual therapy, and neural mobilization techniques produces superior and more sustained clinical outcomes compared to isolated treatment strategies. Lumbar exercises play a critical role in restoring spinal stability, improving neuromuscular control, and preventing recurrence, while manual therapy provides rapid pain relief and enhances joint mobility, thereby facilitating active rehabilitation. Overall, an integrated physiotherapy approach that combines active and passive interventions, along with patient adherence to prescribed exercise programs, is essential for optimizing functional recovery and long-term outcomes in individuals with lumbar PIVD.
1. Fritz, J. M., Childs, J. D., Wainner, R. S., & Flynn, T. W. (2005). Primary care referral of patients with low back pain to physical therapy: Impact on future healthcare utilization and costs. Spine, 37(25), 2114–2121. 2. Ferreira, P. H., Ferreira, M. L., Maher, C. G., Refshauge, K. M., & Herbert, R. D. (2006). Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: A systematic review. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 52(2), 79–88. 3. Childs, J. D., Fritz, J. M., Flynn, T. W., Irrgang, J. J., Johnson, K. K., Majkowski, G. R., et al. (2004). A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain likely to benefit from spinal manipulation. Spine, 29(9), 1024–1032. 4. Hayden, J. A., van Tulder, M. W., Malmivaara, A., & Koes, B. W. (2005). Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD000335. 5. McGill, S. M. (2007). Low back disorders: Evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics. 6. Butler, D. S., & Moseley, G. L. (2003). Explain pain. NOI Group Publications. 7. Adams, M. A., & Dolan, P. (2012). Intervertebral disc degeneration: Evidence for two distinct phenotypes. Journal of Anatomy, 221(6), 497–506. 8. Hodges, P. W., & Richardson, C. A. (1996). Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. Spine, 21(22), 2640–2650. \ 9. Panjabi, M. M. (1992). The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I: Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 5(4), 383–389. 10. Akuthota, V., & Nadler, S. F. (2004). Core strengthening. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(3 Suppl 1), S86–S92.
Publication Date
5/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...