Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM16036
Volume:
6 |
8 |
Aug 2022
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Management
CMR Technical Campus , Medchal
Department of Management
CMR Technical Campus , Medchal
Department of Management
CMR Technical Campus , Medchal
This paper investigates the effectiveness of online and hybrid learning models in management education, drawing on empirical data collected from 847 students and 132 faculty members across 18 business schools in India between 2020 and 2022. Employing a mixed-methods research design—combining quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and learning outcome analysis—the study assesses three primary dimensions: student academic performance, engagement levels, and perceptions of learning quality. Results indicate that hybrid learning models yield outcomes statistically comparable to or exceeding traditional face-to-face instruction when supported by institutional infrastructure, faculty training, and robust digital platforms. Online-only models demonstrate significant advantages in learner autonomy, accessibility, and flexibility but face challenges in sustaining peer interaction, collaborative skill development, and practical application of management concepts. The paper proposes a Contextual Effectiveness Framework (CEF) for management educators, offering actionable recommendations for designing, implementing, and evaluating technology-mediated learning environments. Implications for accreditation bodies, curriculum designers, and policy makers are also discussed.
KEYWORDS
This study provides robust empirical evidence that hybrid learning models, when properly implemented, represent a highly effective modality for management education—one that is capable of preserving and even enhancing the quality of learning outcomes while substantially extending access and flexibility. Online-only models, while valuable in specific contexts, require more deliberate design attention to replicate the collaborative and relational dimensions of management learning. The COVID-19 pandemic may have accelerated the adoption of online and hybrid learning, but the evidence gathered in this study suggests that this transition, managed thoughtfully, offers a genuine opportunity for management education to become more inclusive, innovative, and impactful. The Contextual Effectiveness Framework offered here is intended as a practical guide for institutions navigating this transformation. Future research should examine longitudinal outcomes—tracking students across their careers to assess whether modality differences in program delivery translate into differences in professional performance—and extend this inquiry to international management education contexts.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Online and blended business education for the 21st century: Current research and future directions. Chandos Publishing. Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students' perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 735–753. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Publication Date
8/25/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
19
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...