Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM16036

Effectiveness of Online and Hybrid Learning Models in Management Education

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM16036

Volume:

6 |

8 |

Aug 2022

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM16036

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DPVR

Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao

Department of Management

CMR Technical Campus , Medchal

Download Author Certificate
GSK

G Suresh Kumar

Department of Management

CMR Technical Campus , Medchal

DPRS

Dr. P. Rama Seshayya

Department of Management

CMR Technical Campus , Medchal

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness of online and hybrid learning models in management education, drawing on empirical data collected from 847 students and 132 faculty members across 18 business schools in India between 2020 and 2022. Employing a mixed-methods research design—combining quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and learning outcome analysis—the study assesses three primary dimensions: student academic performance, engagement levels, and perceptions of learning quality. Results indicate that hybrid learning models yield outcomes statistically comparable to or exceeding traditional face-to-face instruction when supported by institutional infrastructure, faculty training, and robust digital platforms. Online-only models demonstrate significant advantages in learner autonomy, accessibility, and flexibility but face challenges in sustaining peer interaction, collaborative skill development, and practical application of management concepts. The paper proposes a Contextual Effectiveness Framework (CEF) for management educators, offering actionable recommendations for designing, implementing, and evaluating technology-mediated learning environments. Implications for accreditation bodies, curriculum designers, and policy makers are also discussed.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Online Learning Hybrid Learning Management Education Business Schools EdTech Learning Outcomes Blended Learning Higher Education India

Cite This Article

Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao, G Suresh Kumar, Dr. P. Rama Seshayya, "Effectiveness of Online and Hybrid Learning Models in Management Education," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1-9, Aug 2022. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM16036

Full Article/Conclusion

This study provides robust empirical evidence that hybrid learning models, when properly implemented, represent a highly effective modality for management education—one that is capable of preserving and even enhancing the quality of learning outcomes while substantially extending access and flexibility. Online-only models, while valuable in specific contexts, require more deliberate design attention to replicate the collaborative and relational dimensions of management learning. The COVID-19 pandemic may have accelerated the adoption of online and hybrid learning, but the evidence gathered in this study suggests that this transition, managed thoughtfully, offers a genuine opportunity for management education to become more inclusive, innovative, and impactful. The Contextual Effectiveness Framework offered here is intended as a practical guide for institutions navigating this transformation. Future research should examine longitudinal outcomes—tracking students across their careers to assess whether modality differences in program delivery translate into differences in professional performance—and extend this inquiry to international management education contexts.

References

Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Online and blended business education for the 21st century: Current research and future directions. Chandos Publishing. Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students' perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 735–753. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.  

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/25/2022

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

19

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...