Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59761
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
â Work from Home (WFH) has become one of the biggest changes in how people work today. What started as a temporary solution during the COVID-19 pandemic has now become a regular way of working for many companies. The findings show that WFH can improve productivity when employees have flexibility, a comfortable place to work, and good digital tools to work with. It also helps to reduce travel time and stress. However, WFH can also create problems, such as communication issues, distractions at home, feelings of isolation, and difficulty in separating work from personal life. Our survey found that 48.6% of respondents felt higher productivity when working from home, and 73.8% reported achieving 4-8 hours of focused work done each day. A major takeaway is that hybrid work modelsâ wherein employees split their time between home and officeâoffer a balanced approach that supports both productivity and well-being. 68.9% of the survey respondents preferred hybrid arrangements. While employees feel productive, objective measures sometimes show different results, indicating the need for better ways to measure productivity. Future research should focus on long-term studies, developing countries, and finding the best hybrid work schedules.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...