Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM61977

Efficient Deployment of Lightweight Language Models on Low-Resource Personal Computers: A Quantitative Benchmark Study

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM61977

Volume:

10 |

4 |

April 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM61977

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Rishav Kumar Mishra

Rishav Kumar Mishra

Computer Science And Engineering Specialization with AI

Babu Banarasi Das University

Download Author Certificate
Jinnat Parwin

Jinnat Parwin

Computer Science And Engineering Specialization with AI

Babu Banarasi Das University

Download Co-Author Certificate
Sachin Guatm

Sachin Guatm

Computer Science And Engineering Specialization with AI

Babu Banarasi Das University

Download Co-Author Certificate
Om Hari Singh Yadav

Om Hari Singh Yadav

Computer Science And Engineering Specialization with AI

Babu Banarasi Das University

Download Co-Author Certificate
Md Danish

Md Danish

Computer Science And Engineering Specialization with AI

Babu Banarasi Das University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Ghanshyam Shivhare

Ghanshyam Shivhare

Computer Science And Engineering Specialization with AI

National Institute of Electronics & Information Technology

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has been largely constrained to cloud-based deployment on high-end GPU infrastructure, limiting accessibility for users in privacy-sensitive, low-bandwidth, or low-resource environments. This paper presents a systematic empirical study of five quantized lightweight LLMs deployed on a consumer-grade laptop limited to 8 GB RAM using CPU-only inference via llama.cpp. The models evaluated are TinyLlama 1.1B at Q2_K and Q4_K_M quantization, Phi-2 2.7B at Q4_K_M, Llama 3.2 1B at Q4_K_M, and Llama 3.2 3B at Q4_K_M. Experiments measure generation throughput in tokens per second, end-to-end latency, peak RAM consumption, and CPU utilization across standardized prompt tasks with three repeated runs for statistical reliability. Results demonstrate that sub-1B parameter models at aggressive quantization achieve real-time throughput exceeding 19 tok/s within a 1 GB RAM footprint, confirming their viability for offline edge deployment. In contrast, models with large context windows such as Llama 3.2 1B and 3B exhibit disproportionate RAM consumption due to KV cache pre-allocation, saturating available memory regardless of model file size. A quantization ablation study on TinyLlama reveals that Q2_K outperforms Q4_K_M in throughput by 17.2% despite lower bit-width, a result attributed to reduced memory bandwidth pressure. Practical deployment recommendations and optimization strategies for improving locally-run LLM efficiency are derived from the empirical findings.

KEYWORDS

Keywords — edge AI lightweight LLMs model quantization llama.cpp on-device inference GGUF TinyLlama Phi-2 Llama 3.2 resource-constrained deployment

Cite This Article

Rishav Kumar Mishra, Jinnat Parwin, Sachin Guatm, Om Hari Singh Yadav, Md Danish, Ghanshyam Shivhare, "Efficient Deployment of Lightweight Language Models on Low-Resource Personal Computers: A Quantitative Benchmark Study," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-9, April 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM61977

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presented the first systematic benchmark study of five quantized lightweight LLMs deployed exclusively on CPU-based consumer laptop hardware with 8 GB RAM, providing empirical evidence to answer a question of significant practical importance: which models can actually run usably on the hardware that most people own. Our core finding is clear and actionable: sub-1B parameter models quantized to Q2_K or Q4_K_M format are fully viable for real-time local inference on 8 GB RAM hardware, achieving 19–23 tok/s within a 1 GB memory footprint. This performance level supports interactive applications including chatbots, writing assistants, coding helpers, and offline document analysis tools — all without cloud dependency, internet connection, or GPU. The TinyLlama 1.1B Q2_K model, in particular, emerges as the optimal choice for constrained edge deployment, offering the best throughput, lowest RAM usage, and fastest cold-start time of any model tested. The quantization ablation analysis reveals an important and non-obvious insight: on memory-bandwidth-constrained consumer hardware, more aggressive quantization (Q2_K) can outperform higher-precision alternatives (Q4_K_M) in throughput. This occurs because reduced weight size decreases memory bandwidth demand per decoding step, a bottleneck that dominates performance on DDR4-constrained systems. This finding challenges the common assumption that higher quantization quality always translates to better system performance. A critical finding for practitioners considering Llama 3.2 deployment is the RAM amplification caused by large context windows. The 128K token context window in Llama 3.2 1B and 3B causes KV cache pre-allocation that consumes 4–5 GB of RAM regardless of actual inference context length, making these models impractical for 8 GB RAM deployment in their default configuration. The --ctx-size 2048 optimization flag resolves this issue, potentially transforming Llama 3.2 1B into one of the most capable models deployable within a 1.5 GB RAM budget. This optimization, combined with partial GPU offload for available discrete GPUs, represents the most impactful configuration changes for edge deployment. Looking at the broader picture, our results validate the edge AI deployment hypothesis: meaningful, general-purpose AI inference is achievable on consumer hardware without cloud dependency. The combination of efficient quantized model formats, optimized CPU inference engines, and careful model selection creates a viable pathway to private, offline, and accessible AI applications running directly on end-user devices. Future work will extend this study in several directions. GPU offload characterization using the GTX 1650 Max-Q will complete the CPU+GPU hybrid deployment picture. Output quality evaluation via perplexity measurements and task-specific benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K) will quantify the quality-efficiency trade-offs across quantization levels. Extension to a broader hardware range including AMD Ryzen laptops and Apple Silicon will test generalizability of our findings. Finally, evaluation of newer model families including Mistral 3B, Gemma 2 2B, and Qwen 1.5B will keep the benchmark current as the lightweight LLM landscape continues to evolve rapidly.

References

[1] T. Brown et al., "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [2] K. Schwartz, J. Dodge, N. A. Smith, and O. Etzioni, "Green AI," Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 54–63, Dec. 2020. [3] G. Gerganov, "llama.cpp: LLM Inference in C/C++," GitHub Repository, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp [4] B. Jacob et al., "Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference," in Proc. IEEE/CVF CVPR, pp. 2704–2713, 2018. [5] E. Frantar, S. Ashkboos, T. Hoefler, and D. Alistarh, "GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17323, Oct. 2022.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

4/30/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...