Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64917
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science
RV College of Engineering
Computer Science
RV College of Engineering
Computer Science
RV College of Engineering
Industrial Management
RV College of Engineering
Election misinformation campaigns typically do not rely on individual falsehoods but rather employ paraphrasing, coordinated amplification, and emotional manipulation to dis-seminate their content. The ElectionShield Live system can be used to combat such misinformation strategies through four inter-connected components, including a Narrative Intelligence Engine based on RoBERTa, an emotional manipulation detection tool, an SBERT-based semantic clustering engine, and a coordination detector based on behavioral anomalies. These tools produce results that are accessible via a light-weight dashboard interface that election observers, analysts, and media organizations can use to monitor misinformation attacks. The evaluation shows classification accuracy of 91.4%, clustering F1-score of 0.887, and coordination detection accuracy of 88.2%. Moreover, the end-to-end response time is less than 2.3 seconds under realistic workloads.
KEYWORDS
This paper presents ElectionShield Live, a real-time frame-work for identifying semantically adaptive, emotionally ma-nipulative, and behaviorally coordinated election narratives. By combining narrative classification, emotion scoring, seman-tic clustering, coordination detection, and dashboard visualiza-tion, the system moves beyond isolated fake-news prediction toward campaign-level monitoring. Results indicate strong performance across the main tasks, including 91.4% misinformation classification accuracy, 0.887 clustering F1, 0.901 weighted emotion F1, and 88.2% co-ordination detection accuracy, while maintaining near-real-time response. So, the framework keeps the paper’s main technology more usable form.
[1] K. Sharma, F. Qian, H. Jiang, N. Ruchansky, M. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation Techniques,” ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–42, 2019. [2] R. DiResta, K. Shaffer, B. Ruppel, D. Sullivan, R. Matney, R. Fox, J. Albright, and B. Johnson, “The Tactics and Tropes of the Internet Research Agency,” New Knowledge, Tech. Rep., 2019. [3] V. Pe´rez-Rosas, B. Kleinberg, A. Lefevre, and R. Mihalcea, “Automatic Detection of Fake News,” in Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Comput. Linguistics (COLING), 2018, pp. 3391–3401. [4] O. Varol, E. Ferrara, C. A. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, “Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization,” in Proc. 11th Int. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media (ICWSM), 2017, pp. 280–289. [5] W. L. Bennett and S. Livingston, “The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions,” Eur. J. Commun., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 122–139, 2018. [6] C. Wardle and H. Derakhshan, “Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking,” Council of Europe, Tech. Rep. DGI(2017)09, 2017. [7] P. N. Howard, S. Bradshaw, B. Kollanyi, and L.-M. Neudert, “Sourcing and Automation of Political News and Information During Three Si-multaneous Elections,” Political Commun., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 331–344, 2018. [8] R. Evangelista and F. Bruno, “WhatsApp and Political Instability in Brazil: Targeted Messages and Political Radicalisation,” Internet Policy Rev., vol. 8, no. 4, 2019. [9] N. Reimers and I. Gurevych, “Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings Using Siamese BERT-Networks,” in Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Process. (EMNLP), 2019, pp. 3982–3992. [10] W. J. Brady, J. A. Wills, J. T. Jost, J. A. Tucker, and J. J. Van Bavel, “Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 114, no. 28, pp. 7313–7318, 2017.
Publication Date
6/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...