Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67209

Emerging Pharmacological Therapies in the Treatment of Atherosclerosis: A Review

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67209

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67209

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Al Amin

Al Amin

pharmacy

UNIVERSITY OF DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE

Download Author Certificate
Prof. Shamima Ahsan

Prof. Shamima Ahsan

pharmacy

UNIVERSITY OF DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Despite decades of progress made with statins and proven lipid-lowering strategies, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is still the primary driver of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Even with treatment to the guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target, a significant residual risk remains that has driven the development of additional drug classes that target other complementary pathways of atherogenesis, such as hepatic PCSK9 synthesis, ATP-citrate lyase, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] production, and vascular inflammation. The review highlights the latest evidence on emerging drugs for atherosclerosis, such as small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy (inclisiran); ATP-citrate lyase inhibitors (bempedoic acid); CETP inhibitors (obicetrapib); Lp(a) directed antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs (pelacarsen, olpasiran, lepodisiran, zerlasiran); and the oral small molecule muvalaplin; in addition to anti-inflammatory drugs such as colchicine and agents that block the IL-1β and IL-6 pathways. Results so far are consistent with meaningful and durable decreases in atherogenic lipoproteins across multiple novel classes of drugs, with cardiovascular outcome benefit already established for bempedoic acid and colchicine, and outcome trials for Lp(a)-lowering agents and the CETP inhibitor obicetrapib ongoing. However, the recently reported ZEUS trial showed that although IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab was associated with powerful suppression of inflammatory biomarkers, it did not translate into a clinical benefit in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events. Taken together, these findings point toward a shift in treatment directions for atherosclerosis toward mechanism-diverse, precision-guided pharmacotherapy, and emphasize the need for large, well-powered outcome trials before biomarker-driven therapies can become part of routine care.

KEYWORDS

Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Risk Inflammation Novel Therapies Precision Treatment

Cite This Article

Al Amin, Prof. Shamima Ahsan, "Emerging Pharmacological Therapies in the Treatment of Atherosclerosis: A Review," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-9, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67209

Full Article/Conclusion

here is now considerable diversity in the pharmacologic management of atherosclerosis, which goes well beyond a statin-only strategy for lowering LDL-C. While intensive LDL-C lowering continues to be the backbone of ASCVD prevention, therapies targeting other pathways, such as hepatic PCSK9 synthesis, ATP-citrate lyase, CETP, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and vascular inflammation, have been gaining increased attention. Two newer drugs, bempedoic acid and colchicine, have already shown cardiovascular outcome benefits in the right indication and in the appropriate population. In a selected group of patients with coronary disease, low-dose colchicine has also been shown to have cardiovascular benefits. But variations between clinical trials suggest that it may be more or less effective in different patients, with different clinical characteristics and at different stages of treatment. Another significant development is inclisiran, which can achieve long-lasting PCSK9 suppression along with significant LDL-C lowering effects and is administered only twice a year as a maintenance dose. Similarly, obicetrapib has shown very significant effects on LDL-C and other atherogenic lipoproteins. However, it remains to be seen whether it will have a place in routine cardiovascular prevention, pending confirmation of cardiovascular benefit in dedicated outcome studies. The emergence of Lp(a)-targeted therapy may be one of the biggest breakthroughs in preventive cardiology, as it is a largely genetically determined condition and has historically not had a targeted treatment. Efforts to directly target an important element of genetically determined residual cardiovascular risk have shown remarkably large reductions in circulating Lp(a) levels with Pelacarsen, olpasiran, lepodisiran, zerlasiran, and muvalaplin. The big unknown, though, is whether the significant decreases in Lp(a) levels will lead to a decrease in the number of myocardial infarctions, strokes, cardiovascular deaths, and other big adverse cardiovascular events. Selected inflammatory pathways are modifiable therapeutically to decrease cardiovascular events with the use of canakinumab and colchicine. By comparison, the ZEUS trial in patients with ziltivekimab showed that a significant reduction in inflammatory markers does not always lead to cardiovascular benefits. This study highlights that biological plausibility and successful modulation of the biomarker does not necessarily mean that outcomes for patients will improve, and that the effects of modulation in different inflammatory pathways may be very different. In general, the future of atherothrombotic drug therapy will be more personalized and mechanism-based, with treatment directed towards the primary drivers of cardiovascular risk that remain after pharmacotherapy. However, new therapies should be used in addition to existing evidence-based therapy, especially high-intensity LDL-C lowering therapy. All new therapies must be shown to provide a cardiovascular benefit with good safety, treatment burden, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness in well-powered randomized controlled outcome studies before they can be widely used in the clinic. In sum, this integration of novel classes of therapies—lipid-lowering, Lp(a)-directed, and anti-inflammatory—has the potential to significantly broaden the scope for prevention of recurrent ASCVD events and the global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.  

References

Baigent, C., Blackwell, L., Emberson, J., Holland, L. E., Reith, C., Bhala, N., Peto, R., Barnes, E. H., Keech, A., Simes, J., & Collins, R. (2010). Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. The Lancet, 376(9753), 1670–1681. Barter, P. J., Caulfield, M., Eriksson, M., Grundy, S. M., Kastelein, J. J. P., Komajda, M., Lopez-Sendon, J., Mosca, L., Tardif, J.-C., Waters, D. D., & Karon, M. (2007). Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(21), 2109–2122. Bowman, L., Hopewell, J. C., Chen, F., Wallendszus, K., Stevens, W., Collins, R., Wiviott, S. D., Cannon, C. P., Braunwald, E., Sammons, E., Landray, M. J., & HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group. (2017). Effects of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(13), 1217–1227. Clarke, R., Peden, J. F., Hopewell, J. C., Kyriakou, T., Goel, A., Heath, S. C., Parish, S., Barlera, S., Franzosi, M. G., Rust, S., Bennett, D., Silveira, A., Malarstig, A., Green, F. R., Lathrop, M., Gigante, B., Leander, K., de Faire, U., Seedorf, U.,Farrall, M. (2009). Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(26), 2518–2528. Ference, B. A., Ginsberg, H. N., Graham, I., Ray, K. K., Packard, C. J., Bruckert, E., Hegele, R. A., Krauss, R. M., Raal, F. J., Schunkert, H., Watts, G. F., Borén, J., Fazio, S., Horton, J. D., Masana, L., Nicholls, S. J., Nordestgaard, B. G., van de Sluis, B., Taskinen, M.-R., … Catapano, A. L. (2017). Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. European Heart Journal, 38(32), 2459–2472. Kronenberg, F., Mora, S., Stroes, E. S. G., Ference, B. A., Arsenault, B. J., Berglund, L., Bruckert, E., Catapano, A. L., Couture, P., Descamps, O. S., Dieplinger, H., Durrington, P. N., Ezhov, M., Fruchart, J.-C., Genest, J., Ginsberg, H. N., Hofmann, S. L., Kamstrup, P. R., … Watts, G. F. (2022). Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: A European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement. European Heart Journal, 43(39), 3925–3946. Libby, P. (2021). The changing landscape of atherosclerosis. Nature, 592, 524–533.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/26/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

6

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...