Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67209
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

pharmacy
UNIVERSITY OF DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE

pharmacy
UNIVERSITY OF DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE
Despite decades of progress made with statins and proven lipid-lowering strategies, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is still the primary driver of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Even with treatment to the guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target, a significant residual risk remains that has driven the development of additional drug classes that target other complementary pathways of atherogenesis, such as hepatic PCSK9 synthesis, ATP-citrate lyase, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] production, and vascular inflammation. The review highlights the latest evidence on emerging drugs for atherosclerosis, such as small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy (inclisiran); ATP-citrate lyase inhibitors (bempedoic acid); CETP inhibitors (obicetrapib); Lp(a) directed antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs (pelacarsen, olpasiran, lepodisiran, zerlasiran); and the oral small molecule muvalaplin; in addition to anti-inflammatory drugs such as colchicine and agents that block the IL-1β and IL-6 pathways. Results so far are consistent with meaningful and durable decreases in atherogenic lipoproteins across multiple novel classes of drugs, with cardiovascular outcome benefit already established for bempedoic acid and colchicine, and outcome trials for Lp(a)-lowering agents and the CETP inhibitor obicetrapib ongoing. However, the recently reported ZEUS trial showed that although IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab was associated with powerful suppression of inflammatory biomarkers, it did not translate into a clinical benefit in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events. Taken together, these findings point toward a shift in treatment directions for atherosclerosis toward mechanism-diverse, precision-guided pharmacotherapy, and emphasize the need for large, well-powered outcome trials before biomarker-driven therapies can become part of routine care.
KEYWORDS
here is now considerable diversity in the pharmacologic management of atherosclerosis, which goes well beyond a statin-only strategy for lowering LDL-C. While intensive LDL-C lowering continues to be the backbone of ASCVD prevention, therapies targeting other pathways, such as hepatic PCSK9 synthesis, ATP-citrate lyase, CETP, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and vascular inflammation, have been gaining increased attention. Two newer drugs, bempedoic acid and colchicine, have already shown cardiovascular outcome benefits in the right indication and in the appropriate population. In a selected group of patients with coronary disease, low-dose colchicine has also been shown to have cardiovascular benefits. But variations between clinical trials suggest that it may be more or less effective in different patients, with different clinical characteristics and at different stages of treatment. Another significant development is inclisiran, which can achieve long-lasting PCSK9 suppression along with significant LDL-C lowering effects and is administered only twice a year as a maintenance dose. Similarly, obicetrapib has shown very significant effects on LDL-C and other atherogenic lipoproteins. However, it remains to be seen whether it will have a place in routine cardiovascular prevention, pending confirmation of cardiovascular benefit in dedicated outcome studies. The emergence of Lp(a)-targeted therapy may be one of the biggest breakthroughs in preventive cardiology, as it is a largely genetically determined condition and has historically not had a targeted treatment. Efforts to directly target an important element of genetically determined residual cardiovascular risk have shown remarkably large reductions in circulating Lp(a) levels with Pelacarsen, olpasiran, lepodisiran, zerlasiran, and muvalaplin. The big unknown, though, is whether the significant decreases in Lp(a) levels will lead to a decrease in the number of myocardial infarctions, strokes, cardiovascular deaths, and other big adverse cardiovascular events. Selected inflammatory pathways are modifiable therapeutically to decrease cardiovascular events with the use of canakinumab and colchicine. By comparison, the ZEUS trial in patients with ziltivekimab showed that a significant reduction in inflammatory markers does not always lead to cardiovascular benefits. This study highlights that biological plausibility and successful modulation of the biomarker does not necessarily mean that outcomes for patients will improve, and that the effects of modulation in different inflammatory pathways may be very different. In general, the future of atherothrombotic drug therapy will be more personalized and mechanism-based, with treatment directed towards the primary drivers of cardiovascular risk that remain after pharmacotherapy. However, new therapies should be used in addition to existing evidence-based therapy, especially high-intensity LDL-C lowering therapy. All new therapies must be shown to provide a cardiovascular benefit with good safety, treatment burden, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness in well-powered randomized controlled outcome studies before they can be widely used in the clinic. In sum, this integration of novel classes of therapies—lipid-lowering, Lp(a)-directed, and anti-inflammatory—has the potential to significantly broaden the scope for prevention of recurrent ASCVD events and the global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Baigent, C., Blackwell, L., Emberson, J., Holland, L. E., Reith, C., Bhala, N., Peto, R., Barnes, E. H., Keech, A., Simes, J., & Collins, R. (2010). Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. The Lancet, 376(9753), 1670–1681. Barter, P. J., Caulfield, M., Eriksson, M., Grundy, S. M., Kastelein, J. J. P., Komajda, M., Lopez-Sendon, J., Mosca, L., Tardif, J.-C., Waters, D. D., & Karon, M. (2007). Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(21), 2109–2122. Bowman, L., Hopewell, J. C., Chen, F., Wallendszus, K., Stevens, W., Collins, R., Wiviott, S. D., Cannon, C. P., Braunwald, E., Sammons, E., Landray, M. J., & HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group. (2017). Effects of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(13), 1217–1227. Clarke, R., Peden, J. F., Hopewell, J. C., Kyriakou, T., Goel, A., Heath, S. C., Parish, S., Barlera, S., Franzosi, M. G., Rust, S., Bennett, D., Silveira, A., Malarstig, A., Green, F. R., Lathrop, M., Gigante, B., Leander, K., de Faire, U., Seedorf, U.,Farrall, M. (2009). Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(26), 2518–2528. Ference, B. A., Ginsberg, H. N., Graham, I., Ray, K. K., Packard, C. J., Bruckert, E., Hegele, R. A., Krauss, R. M., Raal, F. J., Schunkert, H., Watts, G. F., Borén, J., Fazio, S., Horton, J. D., Masana, L., Nicholls, S. J., Nordestgaard, B. G., van de Sluis, B., Taskinen, M.-R., … Catapano, A. L. (2017). Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. European Heart Journal, 38(32), 2459–2472. Kronenberg, F., Mora, S., Stroes, E. S. G., Ference, B. A., Arsenault, B. J., Berglund, L., Bruckert, E., Catapano, A. L., Couture, P., Descamps, O. S., Dieplinger, H., Durrington, P. N., Ezhov, M., Fruchart, J.-C., Genest, J., Ginsberg, H. N., Hofmann, S. L., Kamstrup, P. R., … Watts, G. F. (2022). Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: A European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement. European Heart Journal, 43(39), 3925–3946. Libby, P. (2021). The changing landscape of atherosclerosis. Nature, 592, 524–533.
Publication Date
9/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
6
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...