Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52494
Volume:
9 |
9 |
Sep 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The exponential growth of blockchain technology has raised significant concerns about energy consumption and environmental sustainability. Traditional consensus mechanisms, particularly Proof-ofWork (PoW), consume substantial amounts of energy without considering the availability of renewable energy sources. This paper proposes an Energy-Adaptive Consensus Mechanism (EACM) that dynamically adjusts blockchain operations based on renewable energy prediction models. Our approach integrates machine learning-based forecasting of solar and wind energy availability with consensus timing and difficulty adjustments. Through comprehensive simulations and real-world data analysis, we demonstrate that EACM achieves a 35.2% reduction in carbon footprint while maintaining network security and decentralization properties. The proposed mechanism employs Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for renewable energy prediction and implements adaptive difficulty adjustment algorithms that optimize mining operations during periods of high renewable energy availability. Performance evaluation shows improved energy efficiency with minimal impact on transaction throughput and network latency. Our contributions include a novel consensus framework, predictive energy models, and empirical validation demonstrating the feasibility of sustainable blockchain operations.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/8/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...