Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63020
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Engineering
Adsul technical campus chas Ahilyanagar
Computer Engineering
Adsul technical campus chas Ahilyanagar
Computer Engineering
Adsul technical campus chas Ahilyanagar
Computer Engineering
Adsul technical campus chas Ahilyanagar
Computer Engineering
Adsul technical campus chas Ahilyanagar
Abstract: This study explores the growing challenge of deepfake videos and evaluates the effectiveness of various deep learning algorithms in detecting them. Models such as InceptionResNetV2, VGG19 CNN, Xception, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB1, DenseNet121, Hybrid architectures, LSTM, ResNeXt-LSTM, and MRIGAN were tested to identify the most reliable approaches. The results highlight that Xception achieved the highest accuracy at 99.32%, while InceptionResNetV2 and DenseNet121 also demonstrated strong performance with accuracies above 99%. In contrast, models like VGG19 and LSTM produced comparatively lower results, indicating the need for further optimization. Overall, the findings emphasize the steady progress in detection techniques, which is crucial for countering the harmful effects of deepfakes, including misinformation and violations of privacy. The findings illustrate the rapid progress in detection techniques, reflecting the growing sophistication of deepfake generation methods. higher resilience and accuracy. Ultimately, the work contributes to the development of reliable tools that can help mitigate the societal risks posed by deepfakes and strengthen trust in digital media environments.
KEYWORDS
This study demonstrates the growing effectiveness of deep learning techniques in detecting deepfake content through advanced architectures such as Xception and InceptionResNetV2. These models achieved strong performance in terms of accuracy, precision, and recall when differentiating authentic media from manipulated content. Although these approaches require substantial computational resources, they provide a balanced combination of reliability and performance for complex deepfake detection tasks. Simpler convolutional neural network (CNN) models can serve as a foundational approach, but further optimization is necessary before they can be effectively deployed in real-world environments. The findings suggest that advanced detection models are especially valuable in sensitive domains such as digital journalism, cybersecurity, identity protection, and social media content verification, where manipulated media can create serious social and security concerns. The research also emphasizes the broader capability of deep learning systems to address challenges related to misinformation, fabricated visual content, and image-based defamation. Future work should focus on enhancing the robustness and adaptability of detection frameworks to keep pace with increasingly sophisticated deepfake generation methods. Further investigation into modern techniques, including reinforcement learning and explainable artificial intelligence, may improve both detection efficiency and model transparency. Collaboration among academic researchers, industry professionals, and policymakers will also be essential for establishing ethical standards and effective protocols for managing deepfake-related risks. In addition, future studies should prioritize real-time detection mechanisms and interpretable model designs that improve user confidence and practical usability in real-world applications.
[1] International Conference on Advancements in Smart, Secure and Intelligent Computing, “Enhanced Deep Fake Detection Using Deep Learning ” 2025. [2] H. A. Khalil and S. A. Maged, “Deepfakes creation and detection using deep learning,” in 2021 International Mobile, Intelligent, and Ubiquitous Computing Conference (MIUCC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–4. [3] T. Zhao, X. Xu, M. Xu, H. Ding, Y. Xiong, and W. Xia, “Learning selfconsistency for deepfake detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 15 023–15 033. [3] Z. Chen and H. Yang, “Attentive semantic exploring for manipulated face detection,” in ICASSP 20212021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1985–1989. [4] Z. Guo, L. Hu, M. Xia, and G. Yang, “Blind detection of glow-based facial forgery,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 76877710, 2021. [5] B. Zi, M. Chang, J. Chen, X. Ma, and Y.-G. Jiang, “Wilddeepfake: A challenging real-world dataset for deepfake detection,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, 2020, pp. 2382– 2390. [6] S. Fernandes, S. Raj, R. Ewetz, J. S. Pannu, S. K. Jha, E. Ortiz, I. Vintila, and M. Salter, “Detecting deepfake videos using attributionbased confidence metric,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2020, pp. 308– 309. [7] U. A. Ciftci, I. Demir, and L. Yin, “Fakecatcher: Detection of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2020. [8] S.-Y. Wang, O. Wang, R. Zhang, A. Owens, and A. A. Efros, “Cnngenerated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 8695–8704.
Publication Date
5/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...