Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67767
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Electronics and Communication Engineering
Nellai Nadar college of engineering and technology
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Nellai Nadar college of engineering and technology
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Nellai Nadar college of engineering and technology
Electronics and Communication Engineering
National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research (NITTTR)
Manual annotation of fish in underwater video is time-consuming and becomes difficult when frames contain small fish, low illumination, complex backgrounds, and coral structures. The difficulty is further increased by underwater-specific visual conditions such as color distortion, reduced visibility, background clutter, occlusion, and variations in the appearance of the same object across different underwater environments. while examining the limitations of detector generalization across different underwater domains. The study follows a progressive experimental methodology. Initially, conventional deep-learning object detectors were investigated to establish a baseline for underwater fish detection. YOLO11n, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and SSD300 were evaluated under the experimental dataset conditions, providing a comparison of detection performance and computational characteristics. Based on the baseline investigation, the study was extended toward an end-to-end transformer-based detection framework using RT-DETR with a PResNet-18 backbone and a single fish class. The strongest examined RT-DETR checkpoint was obtained at epoch 50, achieving a COCO AP@[0.50:0.95] of 0.28847 and an AP50 of 0.60264. The trained detector was subsequently employed as an automatic annotation system for underwater video frames, where confidence-based filtering and duplicate prediction handling were applied to produce fish bounding boxes. An initial automatic annotation experiment involving 61 frames generated 466 predicted fish bounding boxes, demonstrating the practical feasibility of using the trained detector as an annotation-assistance tool. A longer real underwater video containing 2,668 frames was also processed, resulting in 2,247 frames with detected fish and 4,984 predicted fish bounding boxes. These detection counts demonstrate the operational use of the proposed annotation workflow, although they are not considered direct measures of detection accuracy because complete ground-truth annotations were not available for the full video sequences. To investigate real-world generalization, the trained detector was further evaluated on a separate underwater video with different visual characteristics. The experiment revealed significant domain-shift effects, including missed fish, failure to detect small fish, and false detections on coral and other background structures. These observations indicate that changing the confidence threshold alone is insufficient to address the problem because reducing the threshold can increase the number of background false positives. In response to this limitation, a target-domain refinement dataset was developed through manual annotation using Label Studio. Twenty-five target-domain frames were successfully annotated with 253 fish instances using a single fish class while explicitly excluding coral and background structures. The verified dataset was further divided into a 20-image training subset containing 91 fish annotations and a five-image unseen validation subset containing 162 fish annotations. The overall findings demonstrate that deep-learning-based automatic fish annotation is feasible for underwater video processing, but reliable cross-domain deployment remains strongly dependent on the similarity between training and target environments. The study therefore highlights domain shift as a major practical challenge in underwater object detection and establishes a target-domain annotation and refinement workflow for addressing this limitation. The present work focuses on the integration and evaluation of established detection methods rather than proposing a new detector architecture.
KEYWORDS
This paper examined an automatic fish-annotation workflow for underwater video, progressing from conventional detector baselines to a PResNet-18-based RT-DETR detector. The strongest examined checkpoint, at epoch 50, recorded an AP@ [0.50:0.95] of 0.28847 and an AP50 of 0.60264. Automatic annotation produced 466 boxes on 61 images and 4,984 boxes across the 2,668 frames of a 4K video; these figures are operational counts and not accuracy measurements. Testing on a different underwater video revealed missed fish, missed small fish, and coral/background false positives, which shows that domain shift is a major limitation for practical use. In response, 25 target-domain frames were manually annotated with 253 fish and split into 20 training and 5 validation images. Future work will use this dataset for controlled domain-specific fine-tuning with quantitative before-and-after evaluation, and may also investigate integrating CGAA and WCAP into the RT-DETR framework as in UCOE-DETR, reducing coral-related false positives, improving small-fish detection, exploiting temporal consistency across frames, and evaluating on a larger and more diverse collection of underwater videos.
[1] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection,” in Proc. IEEE CVPR, 2016, pp. 779–788. [2] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, “Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks,” IEEE TPAMI, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1137–1149, 2017. [3] W. Liu et al., “SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector,” in Proc. ECCV, 2016, pp. 21–37. [4] T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollár, “Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection,” IEEE TPAMI, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 318–327, 2020. [5] N. Carion et al., “End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers,” in Proc. ECCV, 2020, pp. 213–229. [6] Y. Lv et al., “DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection,” arXiv:2304.08069, 2023. [7] A. Salman et al., “Fish Species Classification in Underwater Videos Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Data Augmentation,” in Proc. IEEE ICIP, 2016, pp. 3483–3487. [8] B. V. Deep and R. Dash, “Underwater Fish Species Recognition Using Deep Learning Techniques,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), 2019, pp. 655–660. [9] V. Pagire and A. Phadke, “Underwater Fish Detection and Classification using Deep Learning,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Controller and Computing for Smart Power (ICICCSP), 2022, pp. 1–4. [10] A. Mahmood et al., “Deep Learning for Coral Classification,” in Handbook of Neural Computation, Academic Press, 2017, pp. 383–401. [11] J. Li and L. Zheng, “UCOE-DETR: An accurate detection transformer with underwater characteristic-oriented encoder,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 176, Art. no. 106033, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2026.106033.
Publication Date
10/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...