Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68022

Enhancing Cloud Security Using Multi-Factor Authentication

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68022

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68022

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

PRATYUSH KUMAR

PRATYUSH KUMAR

Department of Computer Application

BBD UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW

Download Author Certificate
SG

SHIVANI GUPTA

Department of Computer Application

BBD UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW

Download Co-Author Certificate
RV

RAJ VERMA

Department of Computer Application

BBD UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

AS

AASTHA SINGH

Department of Computer Application

BBD University, Lucknow - 226 028, India

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Cloud platforms keep valuable data behind a single login, so stolen or guessed credentials remain one of the easiest ways in. Static multi-factor authentication (MFA) closes much of that gap, but it asks every user for an extra factor on every login, and that friction tempts organisations to weaken their policies. This paper presents RA-MFA, a risk-adaptive MFA framework for cloud applications. After the password check, a lightweight logistic-regression model scores each login attempt from eight contextual signals such as IP reputation, travel velocity, device novelty and behavioural deviation. The score selects one of three responses: allow with a device token, a push/TOTP challenge, or a strong challenge (TOTP plus biometric or a FIDO2 key). We evaluate the framework on a synthetic dataset of 20,000 login events that contains 1,577 account-takeover attempts, and compare it with password-only, static TOTP and rule-based adaptive baselines. On the held-out test set RA-MFA blocked 95.8% of attacks, which is comparable to static MFA (94.7%), while it challenged only 22.9% of legitimate logins and reduced the average added login time from 11.0 s to 2.2 s. We also discuss the limits of simulated evaluation and describe how the framework can be validated on real traffic.

KEYWORDS

adaptive authentication cloud security multi-factor authentication risk scoring zero trust.

Cite This Article

PRATYUSH KUMAR, SHIVANI GUPTA, RAJ VERMA, AASTHA SINGH, "Enhancing Cloud Security Using Multi-Factor Authentication," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-6, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68022

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presented RA-MFA, a risk-adaptive multi-factor authentication framework that uses a transparent logistic-regression score to decide how much proof a cloud login requires. In a controlled simulation with 20,000 synthetic login events, it matched the protection of static TOTP (4.2% versus 5.3% attack success, a difference within sampling error) while challenging fewer than a quarter of genuine logins and cutting added login time by about 80%. It also clearly outperformed a hand-weighted rule-based baseline, which let 15.4% of attacks through. Future work will proceed along four lines: validating the framework on anonymised real login logs in shadow mode; replacing logistic regression with gradient-boosted or sequence models and comparing their interpretability; adding continuous authentication during the session; and studying the privacy cost of behavioural features, possibly with on-device scoring.

References

[1]     M. P. D. Prakash and A. Singh, “Maximizing cloud security: Synergistic approaches to multi-factor authentication deployment,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Recent Advancement and Modernization in Sustainable Intelligent Technologies & Applications (RAMSITA-2025), Adv. Intell. Syst. Res., vol. 192, 2025, pp. 945–955, doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-716-8_70. [2]     R. R. Pell Reddy, “Empowering cloud security: Pioneering an interactive multi-factor authentication framework for cloud user verification,” Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol., vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 168–178, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I6P122. [3]     A. H. M. Aburbeian and M. Fernández-Veiga, “Secure internet financial transactions: A framework integrating multi-factor authentication and machine learning,” AI, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 177–194, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ai5010010. [4]     R. O. Okeke and S. O. Orimadike, “Enhanced cloud computing security using application-based multi-factor authentication (MFA) for communication systems,” Eur. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.24018/ejece.2024.8.2.593. [5]     Y. Han, H. Guo, J. Liu, B. B. Ehui, Y. Wu, and S. Li, “An enhanced multifactor authentication and key agreement protocol in industrial Internet of Things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, pp. 16243–16254, 2024, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3355228. [6]     S. Shukla and S. J. Patel, “A design of provably secure multi-factor ECC-based authentication protocol in multi-server cloud architecture,” Cluster Comput., vol. 27, pp. 1559–1580, 2024. [7]     R. Konwar, D. Jha, R. Agrawal, R. Purkayastha, and I. Banerjee, “A two-factor authentication mechanism using a novel OTP generation algorithm for cloud applications,” in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Cloud Comput., Data Sci. Eng. (Confluence), 2024, pp. 245–250, doi: 10.1109/Confluence60223.2024.10463309.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/15/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

3

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

11

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...