Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM33411
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Enhancing the authenticity of online product reviews is crucial for maintaining consumer trust and facilitating informed purchasing decisions. In this paper, we focus on the application of opinion mining techniques to detect and remove fake reviews, thereby improving the reliability of online review platforms. Drawing upon a comprehensive review of existing literature, we explore various methodologies for identifying deceptive opinion spam, such as network-based approaches, anomaly detection, and unsupervised learning. By leveraging insights from sentiment analysis and pattern recognition, we propose strategies for uncovering suspicious review patterns and detecting anomalies in review networks. Our analysis encompasses techniques for identifying fake reviewer groups, estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities, and learning to differentiate between genuine and fraudulent reviews. Through the synthesis of these methods, we aim to provide practical recommendations for mitigating the impact of fake reviews on online platforms and enhancing the trustworthiness of product evaluations for consumers. Our research delves into various aspects of fake review detection and removal, including identifying fake reviewer groups, estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities, and employing machine learning algorithms to differentiate between genuine and fraudulent reviews. By synthesizing these methodologies, we aim to offer practical recommendations for online platforms seeking to combat the proliferation of fake reviews and enhance consumer trust.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45419
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...