Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64811
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Master of Business Administration
MLR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, HYDERABAD, INDIA
Department of Master of Business Administration
MLR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, HYDERABAD, INDIA
Department of Master of Business Administration
MLR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, HYDERABAD, INDIA
The paper evaluates the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance on cost of capital and intrinsic value of Adani Green Energy Limited (AGEL), the biggest renewable energy firm in India. With an augmented Discounted Cash Flow approach that considers the ESG performance, the study designs two policy frameworks related to the Net-Zero commitment made by India: Base policy framework and Accelerated decarbonization framework. The cost of equity will be determined using bottom-up CAPM model which incorporates only clean renewable industry peers for assessing the governance risk of AGEL separately from the operational risk. The green bond spread will be disintegrated for calculating environmental and governance risk premium separately. It is found that the primary driver behind the cost of capital of Adani Green Energy Limited is the governance risk due to excessive financial leverage – much more than other risks like operational or environmental. Although cost of capital can be reduced substantially by adopting the accelerated policy scenario, the value increase will be achieved through reduction of discount rate because of high growth and corresponding increased capital expense requirement.
KEYWORDS
To conclude, this study shows that in a highly leveraged renewable energy firm such as AGEL, ESG represents a financially material variable with significant implications for the cost of capital and enterprise value. It has been shown that the high equity risk premium of AGEL does not result from any risk characteristics intrinsic to the renewable energy business model but from financial leverage and governance overhang. By analyzing the green bond spreads, it is apparent that while the environmental benefit is offset by the governance penalty, it is demonstrated that the "G" component of ESG is more financially material than the "E" component. In comparing scenarios, there emerges a surprising conclusion that while the accelerated adoption of India's Net-Zero policy does not create value via higher cash flows due to the requirement of increased capital investment necessary for greater capacity generation, it only creates value through lower costs of capital resulting from better governance credibility and ESG signals. This supports the three channels of ESG effect to corporate value transmission identified in the theory - risk management, access to green finance, and alignment with climate policies. This research's main contribution is an operational approach to pricing climate transition risk in renewables.
[1] G. Giese, L.-E. Lee, D. Melas, Z. Nagy, and L. Nishikawa, "Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk and Performance," Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 69–83, 2019. [2] NITI Aayog, "Scenarios Towards Viksit Bharat and Net Zero," Government of India, New Delhi, 2023. [3] Central Electricity Authority, "Installed Capacity Report," Ministry of Power, Government of India, October 2025. [4] D. S. Dhaliwal, O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang, "Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting," The Accounting Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 59–100, 2011. [5] S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, C. C. Y. Kwok, and D. R. Mishra, "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?" Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2388–2406, 2011. [6] D. S. Dhaliwal, O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang, "Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital," The Accounting Review, vol. 86, no. 1, 2011. [7] S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, C. C. Y. Kwok, and D. R. Mishra, "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?" Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 35, 2011. [8] P. C. Godfrey, C. B. Merrill, and J. M. Hansen, "The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30, pp. 425–445, 2009. [9] M. H. Bhuiyan and C. Nguyen, "From CSR to CSV via ESG: An Exploratory Study," Corporate Governance, vol. 20, no. 6, 2020. [10] G. Giese, L.-E. Lee, D. Bender, and L. Lodh, "Foundations of ESG Investing," Journal of Portfolio Management, 2019.
Publication Date
6/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...