Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67181

ESG Performance and Financial Resilience of Indian NBFCs: Does Sustainability Reduce Financial Risk

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67181

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-13

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67181

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

BSB

Bhummannagari Suresh Babu

Department of Commerce

BGS Institute of Management Studies

Download Author Certificate
DGH

Dr. G Haranath

Department of Commerce

Yogi Vemana University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) form a systemically important pillar of India's credit ecosystem, intermediating a significant share of scheduled-commercial-bank-equivalent assets and driving financial inclusion in underserved segments. Following the 2018 IL&FS default and the subsequent tightening of prudential regulation, questions of financial resilience have moved to the centre of NBFC scholarship, even as Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure has simultaneously become mandatory for large listed entities under SEBI's Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework. This paper examines whether ESG performance is systematically associated with the financial performance and financial-risk profile of Indian NBFCs. The study proposes and operationalises two complementary conceptual models — a direct model (ESG performance → financial risk) and a mediated model (ESG performance → operational efficiency → financial performance → financial resilience) — for a purposive sample of large, listed, ESG-rated Indian NBFCs drawn from the RBI's upper- and middle-layer Scale-Based Regulatory Framework. Financial resilience and risk are proxied by Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Tobin's Q, the (non-manufacturing) Altman Z-score, leverage (debt-to-assets), and the Gross Non-Performing Asset (NPA) ratio, regressed on CRISIL/SEBI-registered ESG Rating Provider composite scores using panel-data techniques (fixed/random effects, with system-GMM as a robustness check), for the period FY2020 to FY2026 to the extent audited secondary data are available. Consistent with the broader Indian and international literature reviewed here, ESG performance is expected to relate positively to profitability and market valuation and negatively to leverage and NPA ratios, with the relationship strengthening over time and operating partly through improved operational efficiency and governance-driven risk discipline. Sector-level evidence corroborates this directional story: NBFC gross NPAs fell from 3.5 percent (March 2024) to 2.9 percent (March 2025) even as the sector's balance sheet expanded by 18.9 percent, alongside a documented rise in CRISIL ESG ratings among large NBFCs over the same period. While ESG–financial performance links have been documented for Indian banks and diversified listed firms, a 2026 systematic review of the Indian NBFC literature explicitly identifies ESG integration, AI-driven risk analytics, and the ethical dimensions of digital lending as underexplored themes. This paper responds directly to that gap by developing an NBFC-specific analytical framework and a transparent, ethically documented methodology for testing the ESG–financial-risk relationship, and by candidly distinguishing verified secondary evidence from illustrative demonstration analysis so that the approach can be replicated with institutional-grade panel data (e.g., CMIE Prowess, Bloomberg, Refinitiv).

KEYWORDS

ESG performance; financial resilience; financial risk; Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs); India; Altman Z-score; Return on Assets; Return on Equity; Tobin's Q; leverage; Non-Performing Assets; operational efficiency; BRSR; sustainable finance

Cite This Article

Bhummannagari Suresh Babu, Dr. G Haranath, "ESG Performance and Financial Resilience of Indian NBFCs: Does Sustainability Reduce Financial Risk," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-13, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67181

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper set out to examine whether ESG performance is associated with the financial performance and financial risk of Indian NBFCs — a question motivated by the sector's history of governance-driven crises, its newly mandatory ESG disclosure regime, and a specific, recently documented gap in the Indian NBFC literature (Madhusudhan & Kumar, 2026). Drawing on a rigorous review of Indian and international ESG–financial-performance and ESG–financial-risk evidence, the paper developed a dual conceptual model — a direct ESG-to-financial-risk model and a mediated ESG-to-operational-efficiency-to-financial-performance-to-financial-resilience model — and specified a transparent, ethically documented panel-data methodology, using ROA, ROE, Tobin's Q, the Altman Z-score, leverage and the Gross NPA ratio as outcome measures, for a purposive sample of large listed Indian NBFCs over FY2020–FY2026.   Verified sector- and firm-level evidence — a sector-wide decline in NBFC Gross NPAs alongside rising capital adequacy, and a documented CRISIL ESG rating upgrade at a major NBFC occurring within this same period — is directionally consistent with the hypothesised relationship, and the illustrative demonstration analysis in Section 7 shows how the proposed panel-regression and mediation models would be estimated and reported once a complete institutional-grade dataset is assembled. Consistent with the ethical standards this paper has sought to uphold throughout, these illustrative results are explicitly not presented as proof of the hypothesized relationship; that proof remains an important item of future empirical work, for which this paper provides a complete, replicable, and directly usable research design. In the interim, the weight of the broader Indian and international evidence reviewed here suggests that sustainability is unlikely to be merely a compliance cost for Indian NBFCs, and may instead be a meaningful, governance-anchored contributor to the financial resilience of a sector whose stability remains central to India's continued financial inclusion and credit-deepening agenda.

References

Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), Article 1900500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1900500 Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2006). Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Biju, A. V. N., Geetha, S., Prasad, S., Sasidharan, A., & Jayachandran, A. (2025). ESG-firm performance nexus: Evidence from an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 3469–3496. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4152 CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited. (2026). ESG ratings list. https://www.crisilesg.com/en/home/esg-ratings.html Dwibedi, P., Pahi, D., & Sahu, A. (2024). Unveiling the relationship between ESG scores and firm performance in India: A system GMM approach. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(3), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i3.03 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 Gidage, M., Bhide, S., Pahurkar, R., & Kolte, A. (2024). ESG performance and systemic risk nexus: Role of firm-specific factors in Indian companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(9), Article 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17090381

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/10/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...