Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67181
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Commerce
BGS Institute of Management Studies
Department of Commerce
Yogi Vemana University
Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) form a systemically important pillar of India's credit ecosystem, intermediating a significant share of scheduled-commercial-bank-equivalent assets and driving financial inclusion in underserved segments. Following the 2018 IL&FS default and the subsequent tightening of prudential regulation, questions of financial resilience have moved to the centre of NBFC scholarship, even as Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure has simultaneously become mandatory for large listed entities under SEBI's Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework. This paper examines whether ESG performance is systematically associated with the financial performance and financial-risk profile of Indian NBFCs. The study proposes and operationalises two complementary conceptual models — a direct model (ESG performance → financial risk) and a mediated model (ESG performance → operational efficiency → financial performance → financial resilience) — for a purposive sample of large, listed, ESG-rated Indian NBFCs drawn from the RBI's upper- and middle-layer Scale-Based Regulatory Framework. Financial resilience and risk are proxied by Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Tobin's Q, the (non-manufacturing) Altman Z-score, leverage (debt-to-assets), and the Gross Non-Performing Asset (NPA) ratio, regressed on CRISIL/SEBI-registered ESG Rating Provider composite scores using panel-data techniques (fixed/random effects, with system-GMM as a robustness check), for the period FY2020 to FY2026 to the extent audited secondary data are available. Consistent with the broader Indian and international literature reviewed here, ESG performance is expected to relate positively to profitability and market valuation and negatively to leverage and NPA ratios, with the relationship strengthening over time and operating partly through improved operational efficiency and governance-driven risk discipline. Sector-level evidence corroborates this directional story: NBFC gross NPAs fell from 3.5 percent (March 2024) to 2.9 percent (March 2025) even as the sector's balance sheet expanded by 18.9 percent, alongside a documented rise in CRISIL ESG ratings among large NBFCs over the same period. While ESG–financial performance links have been documented for Indian banks and diversified listed firms, a 2026 systematic review of the Indian NBFC literature explicitly identifies ESG integration, AI-driven risk analytics, and the ethical dimensions of digital lending as underexplored themes. This paper responds directly to that gap by developing an NBFC-specific analytical framework and a transparent, ethically documented methodology for testing the ESG–financial-risk relationship, and by candidly distinguishing verified secondary evidence from illustrative demonstration analysis so that the approach can be replicated with institutional-grade panel data (e.g., CMIE Prowess, Bloomberg, Refinitiv).
KEYWORDS
This paper set out to examine whether ESG performance is associated with the financial performance and financial risk of Indian NBFCs — a question motivated by the sector's history of governance-driven crises, its newly mandatory ESG disclosure regime, and a specific, recently documented gap in the Indian NBFC literature (Madhusudhan & Kumar, 2026). Drawing on a rigorous review of Indian and international ESG–financial-performance and ESG–financial-risk evidence, the paper developed a dual conceptual model — a direct ESG-to-financial-risk model and a mediated ESG-to-operational-efficiency-to-financial-performance-to-financial-resilience model — and specified a transparent, ethically documented panel-data methodology, using ROA, ROE, Tobin's Q, the Altman Z-score, leverage and the Gross NPA ratio as outcome measures, for a purposive sample of large listed Indian NBFCs over FY2020–FY2026. Verified sector- and firm-level evidence — a sector-wide decline in NBFC Gross NPAs alongside rising capital adequacy, and a documented CRISIL ESG rating upgrade at a major NBFC occurring within this same period — is directionally consistent with the hypothesised relationship, and the illustrative demonstration analysis in Section 7 shows how the proposed panel-regression and mediation models would be estimated and reported once a complete institutional-grade dataset is assembled. Consistent with the ethical standards this paper has sought to uphold throughout, these illustrative results are explicitly not presented as proof of the hypothesized relationship; that proof remains an important item of future empirical work, for which this paper provides a complete, replicable, and directly usable research design. In the interim, the weight of the broader Indian and international evidence reviewed here suggests that sustainability is unlikely to be merely a compliance cost for Indian NBFCs, and may instead be a meaningful, governance-anchored contributor to the financial resilience of a sector whose stability remains central to India's continued financial inclusion and credit-deepening agenda.
Ahmad, N., Mobarek, A., & Roni, N. N. (2021). Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), Article 1900500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1900500 Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2006). Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Biju, A. V. N., Geetha, S., Prasad, S., Sasidharan, A., & Jayachandran, A. (2025). ESG-firm performance nexus: Evidence from an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 3469–3496. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4152 CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited. (2026). ESG ratings list. https://www.crisilesg.com/en/home/esg-ratings.html Dwibedi, P., Pahi, D., & Sahu, A. (2024). Unveiling the relationship between ESG scores and firm performance in India: A system GMM approach. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(3), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i3.03 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 Gidage, M., Bhide, S., Pahurkar, R., & Kolte, A. (2024). ESG performance and systemic risk nexus: Role of firm-specific factors in Indian companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(9), Article 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17090381
Publication Date
9/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...