Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62252

Ethics of Sentient AI: A Computational and Philosophical Analysis

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62252

Volume:

10 |

4 |

April 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Simran Pandita

Simran Pandita

School of Engineering and Technology

Sushant University

Download Author Certificate
AS

Aditya Sarkar

School of Engineering and Technology

Sushant University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Dr. Urvashi

Dr. Urvashi

School of Engineering and Technology

Sushant University

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has intensified debates regarding the possibility of machine sentience and its ethical implications. While modern AI systems exhibit increasingly complex and adaptive behavior, there is no empirical consensus on whether they possess subjective experience. Existing research in artificial consciousness, including Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and Global Workspace Theory (GWT), suggests that consciousness may emerge from sufficient levels of information integration and computational complexity, whereas current AI ethics frameworks primarily assume non-sentient systems and focus on principles such as fairness, accountability, and transparency. This creates a critical gap in addressing the moral implications of potentially sentient machines. This paper synthesizes prior research in AI consciousness and ethics to examine the conditions under which artificial systems might be considered sentient and the resulting ethical obligations. It further proposes a novel Sentience Risk Assessment Model (SRAM), which integrates computational indicators—such as information integration, feedback dynamics, and adaptive learning capacity—with ethical risk thresholds to enable structured evaluation under uncertainty. The findings emphasize the need for precautionary ethical approaches and the development of quantifiable metrics to guide responsible AI development.

KEYWORDS

Keywords— Sentient AI AI Ethics Artificial Consciousness Integrated Information Theory AI Alignment Reinforcement Learning Ethical AI Sentience Risk Assessment.

Cite This Article

Simran Pandita, Aditya Sarkar, Dr. Urvashi, "Ethics of Sentient AI: A Computational and Philosophical Analysis," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-10, April 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

The question of whether artificial intelligence can become sentient is no longer just a philosophical thought experiment. As AI systems grow more complex, adaptive, and autonomous, the assumption that they are only tools becomes harder to rely on without question. Existing research on artificial consciousness, especially work linked to Integrated Information Theory and Global Workspace Theory, suggests that some computational features may be relevant to consciousness-like processing.[1] At the same time, most AI ethics frameworks still focus on fairness, accountability, and transparency while leaving aside the moral implications of possible machine sentience.[2] This paper addressed that gap by bringing together philosophical theory, technical foundations, and ethical analysis. It also proposed the Sentience Risk Assessment Model, or SRAM, as a structured way to evaluate advanced AI systems under uncertainty. Instead of trying to prove consciousness directly, SRAM estimates sentience-related risk by combining information integration, feedback and recursion, and adaptive learning capacity. These technical indicators are then connected to ethical thresholds, which makes the model more useful for governance and design. The main contribution of this work is not a final answer to whether AI can truly be sentient. That question remains open. The contribution is a practical framework for dealing with that uncertainty responsibly. The broader argument of this paper is simple. Ethical concern should not begin only after absolute proof appears. In a field moving this quickly, waiting for certainty may mean reacting too late.

References

[1] Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07906 [2] Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708 [3] Algorithmic Sentience: Ethical and Technological Challenges in AI Consciousness https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392029278_Algorithmic_Sentience_Ethical_and_Technological_Challenges_in_AI_Consciousness [4] Phenomenology of Machine: Exploring AI Consciousness through Active Inference https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00033 [5] Artificial Consciousness: The Missing Ingredient for Ethical AI? https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2023.1270460/full [6] A Human-Centric Framework for AI Consciousness Ethics https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02544 [7] Exploring the Philosophy of Consciousness in AI: An Ethical Appraisal https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/view/exploring-the-philosophy-of-consciousness-in-ai-an-ethical-appraisal

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/2/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...