Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62252
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

School of Engineering and Technology
Sushant University
School of Engineering and Technology
Sushant University

School of Engineering and Technology
Sushant University
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has intensified debates regarding the possibility of machine sentience and its ethical implications. While modern AI systems exhibit increasingly complex and adaptive behavior, there is no empirical consensus on whether they possess subjective experience. Existing research in artificial consciousness, including Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and Global Workspace Theory (GWT), suggests that consciousness may emerge from sufficient levels of information integration and computational complexity, whereas current AI ethics frameworks primarily assume non-sentient systems and focus on principles such as fairness, accountability, and transparency. This creates a critical gap in addressing the moral implications of potentially sentient machines. This paper synthesizes prior research in AI consciousness and ethics to examine the conditions under which artificial systems might be considered sentient and the resulting ethical obligations. It further proposes a novel Sentience Risk Assessment Model (SRAM), which integrates computational indicators—such as information integration, feedback dynamics, and adaptive learning capacity—with ethical risk thresholds to enable structured evaluation under uncertainty. The findings emphasize the need for precautionary ethical approaches and the development of quantifiable metrics to guide responsible AI development.
KEYWORDS
The question of whether artificial intelligence can become sentient is no longer just a philosophical thought experiment. As AI systems grow more complex, adaptive, and autonomous, the assumption that they are only tools becomes harder to rely on without question. Existing research on artificial consciousness, especially work linked to Integrated Information Theory and Global Workspace Theory, suggests that some computational features may be relevant to consciousness-like processing.[1] At the same time, most AI ethics frameworks still focus on fairness, accountability, and transparency while leaving aside the moral implications of possible machine sentience.[2] This paper addressed that gap by bringing together philosophical theory, technical foundations, and ethical analysis. It also proposed the Sentience Risk Assessment Model, or SRAM, as a structured way to evaluate advanced AI systems under uncertainty. Instead of trying to prove consciousness directly, SRAM estimates sentience-related risk by combining information integration, feedback and recursion, and adaptive learning capacity. These technical indicators are then connected to ethical thresholds, which makes the model more useful for governance and design. The main contribution of this work is not a final answer to whether AI can truly be sentient. That question remains open. The contribution is a practical framework for dealing with that uncertainty responsibly. The broader argument of this paper is simple. Ethical concern should not begin only after absolute proof appears. In a field moving this quickly, waiting for certainty may mean reacting too late.
[1] Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07906 [2] Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708 [3] Algorithmic Sentience: Ethical and Technological Challenges in AI Consciousness https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392029278_Algorithmic_Sentience_Ethical_and_Technological_Challenges_in_AI_Consciousness [4] Phenomenology of Machine: Exploring AI Consciousness through Active Inference https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00033 [5] Artificial Consciousness: The Missing Ingredient for Ethical AI? https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2023.1270460/full [6] A Human-Centric Framework for AI Consciousness Ethics https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02544 [7] Exploring the Philosophy of Consciousness in AI: An Ethical Appraisal https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/view/exploring-the-philosophy-of-consciousness-in-ai-an-ethical-appraisal
Publication Date
5/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...