Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM46243
Volume:
|
|
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Email is one of the most widely used ways of digital communication nowadays, but with that, junk emails have also become more prevalent. These spam messages are not only annoying they can also be harmful, causing security issues such as phishing or data theft. The goal of this research focuses on detecting and filtering spam emails by using machine learning techniques and algorithms. A dataset of 15,267 emails containing spam and ham. Prior to the model training, the dataset was pre-processed by cleaning the textual words converting it into numerical feature vectors using the TF-IDF technique, enabling the algorithms to effectively interpret and analyse the given data. Then applied five well known machine learning algorithms: logistic, svm, naive bayes, decision tree, and random forest. These models were developed and evaluated using tools such as python, the scikit-learn library and Jupiter notebook. To evaluate the effectiveness of each model, performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curve and confusion matrix were employed. Among the models tested, SVM achieved the highest accuracy of closely followed by Random Forest. The results obtained indicates that machine learning models, specifically SVM performs very accurate at detecting spam and improving the security of email communication systems.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...